El 16/10/2024 a las 19:03, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal
escribió:
Prease DON'T add garbage collector. IMO it isn't a good idea. I had
very bad experiences with it. Unless somebody found a new magic
algorithm in the last decade...
El Wed, 16 Oct 2024 04:49:44 -0700
Hairy Pixels via
On 2025-01-21 10:15, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, Frank McCormick via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 2025-01-21 09:00, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, Frank McCormick via fpc-pascal wrote:
I have been trying out a CRT replacement
Is the compiler actually able to inline functions which are used from a
unit? When a unit is used it’s compiled to a .o file and linked so the
compiler doesn’t have access to the source code anymore and thus can’t
inline I would think.
I write this because I’ve recently learned of link-time optimi
On Jan 24, 2025 at 2:10:53 AM, Santi via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> procedure foo()
> var
> s1: TStringList;
> s2: TStringList;
> s3: TStringList;
> begin
> s1:=TStringList.create;
> try
>s2:=TStringList.create;
>try
> s3:=TStringList.create;
> t
On 1/24/25 7:16 AM, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jan 24, 2025 at 11:20:02 AM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal
wrote:
As you can see, it's more complicated and more error prone. You can
simplify it a little bit with goto, but it will never be better,
compared to try...finally
ok, I
On 1/24/25 8:12 AM, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jan 24, 2025 at 12:43:51 PM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal
wrote:
That's not what exceptions are meant to be used for, though. What you
describe is called a program "defect". When you encounter a "defect"
in your program, you terminat
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 24. Jan. 2025, 02:17:
> Is the compiler actually able to inline functions which are used from a
> unit? When a unit is used it’s compiled to a .o file and linked so the
> compiler doesn’t have access to the source code anymore and thus can’t
> inline I
On 1/24/25 8:38 AM, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jan 24, 2025 at 1:34:26 PM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal
wrote:
Doesn't matter whether they're handled in the same scope or not. It's
the same code. Usually they're not handled in the same scope, but in
a very distant place. That's u
On Jan 24, 2025 at 11:20:02 AM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> As you can see, it's more complicated and more error prone. You can
> simplify it a little bit with goto, but it will never be better, compared
> to try...finally
>
>
ok, I’ve never used exc
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 24. Jan. 2025, 06:16:
> Feels to me like manual memory management and exceptions don’t mix well. I
> use exceptions in C# and Swift and they don’t require all this boiler plate
> to prevent memory leaks.
>
Don't know about Swift, but C# uses garbage co
On Jan 24, 2025 at 12:43:51 PM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> That's not what exceptions are meant to be used for, though. What you
> describe is called a program "defect". When you encounter a "defect" in
> your program, you terminate the program. The
On Jan 24, 2025 at 1:34:26 PM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> Doesn't matter whether they're handled in the same scope or not. It's the
> same code. Usually they're not handled in the same scope, but in a very
> distant place. That's usually when except
On 1/24/25 3:21 AM, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jan 24, 2025 at 2:10:53 AM, Santi via fpc-pascal
wrote:
procedure foo()
var
s1: TStringList;
s2: TStringList;
s3: TStringList;
begin
s1:=TStringList.create;
try
s2:=TStringList.create;
try
s3:=TStringList.create;
tr
On 1/24/25 4:04 AM, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jan 24, 2025 at 8:38:25 AM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal
wrote:
Maybe because there's a much better way to write it:
procedure foo();
var
s1: TStringList = nil;
s2: TStringList = nil;
s3: TStringList = nil;
begin
try
s1:=
On Jan 24, 2025 at 8:38:25 AM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> Maybe because there's a much better way to write it:
>
> procedure foo();
> var
> s1: TStringList = nil;
> s2: TStringList = nil;
> s3: TStringList = nil;
> begin
> try
> s1:=TStr
15 matches
Mail list logo
