Re: [fpc-pascal] Dependency of OpenSSL 1.0.2 still in FPC 3.2.0 on some platforms?

2021-05-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 15 May 2021, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: It is not a size problem, the test mail contains just a very small zipfile sample (5 kb in size). And the mail is not in the spam folder either, it is simply silently rejected by GMail... No error message. It turns out that GMail inspect

Re: [fpc-pascal] Dependency of OpenSSL 1.0.2 still in FPC 3.2.0 on some platforms?

2021-05-15 Thread Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 15 May 2021 09:00:08 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: >Glad you got it working. > >I worked for some time for a mass mailing company. >From that experience I assure you that delivering mail is NOT easy. > >Meanwhile, there are a lot of safety mechanisms installed o

Re: [fpc-pascal] Dependency of OpenSSL 1.0.2 still in FPC 3.2.0 on some platforms?

2021-05-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 15 May 2021, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: On Sat, 15 May 2021 09:00:08 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: Glad you got it working. I worked for some time for a mass mailing company. From that experience I assure you that delivering mail is NOT easy. Mea

Re: [fpc-pascal] Dependency of OpenSSL 1.0.2 still in FPC 3.2.0 on some platforms?

2021-05-15 Thread Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:22 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: >Welcome to the world of mailing. >I wish I could say it gets better, but it does not. > >> >> The body of the message is fixed at the moment, I could add a timestamp >> string >> to it but not much more to make