On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
tools to verify downloaded files. But for that, releases must publish
checksums for those files first. Another option is to downloa
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:20 schrieb kardan:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
>
> If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
> tools to verify downloaded files.> But for that, releases must publish
> checks
On 03/12/17 17:36, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:20 schrieb kardan:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
tools to verify downloaded files.> But for that
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:33:04 +0100
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Fri, December 1, 2017 00:55, kardan wrote:
> .
> .
> > In your case it would be probably enough to
> > sha256sum $FILES > SHA256SUMS.txt
> > gpg --sign SHA256SUMS.txt
>
> Sorry, but I'm afraid that you miss the point
In what way?
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:36:09 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Yes. And I were pointing out that your script does not help much as
> it is debian/linux only while we create releases for several
> different OSes.
Does this mean, you are not able to run bash scripts? Or you
cannot find tools to genera
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
> Apart from that, do
> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
> team should have done?
Which release team? We are happy that we managed within 3 month to find people
being able, willing
and having the resources to build and u
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:53 schrieb kardan:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:36:09 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> Yes. And I were pointing out that your script does not help much as
>> it is debian/linux only while we create releases for several
>> different OSes.
>
> Does this mean, you are not able to
Am 29.11.2017 um 06:36 schrieb Christo:
> On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Ring wrote:
>> I am looking for an easy way to have all cortex-m compilers available
>> at the same time to be able to do automated building/testing
>
> There is a similar problem with the AVR target having severa
2017-12-03 18:59 UTC+01:00, Florian Klämpfl :
> Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
>> Apart from that, do
>> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
>> team should have done?
>
> Which release team? We are happy that we managed within 3 month to find
> people bein
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:59:40 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> > If your server is able to host files you will be able to generate a
> > checksum file *anywhere* and put it onto it.
>
> Yes, if somebody with shell access to the server finds to time to set
> this up.
Let's hope someone privileged
Am 03.12.2017 um 19:54 schrieb code dz:
> 2017-12-03 18:59 UTC+01:00, Florian Klämpfl :
>> Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
>>> Apart from that, do
>>> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
>>> team should have done?
>>
>> Which release team? We are happy that
On 2017-12-03 18:56, kardan wrote:
Let's hope someone privileged puts attached file into
https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Source/3.0.4
I got the same downloads from ftp.freepascal.org and ran the shasum
utility against those. I can confirm your SHA256 values are correct.
[F
On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
in new version 3.0.4 you have changed the declaration of some
procedures and functions in the go32 unit.
It does not matter, but I see a little mismatch for linear base address:
FPC 3.0.2
function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longin
In our previous episode, Nikolay Nikolov said:
> >
> > function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
> > function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : dword) : boolean;
> >
> > For get_segment_base_address is correct longint or dword?
> I think (and I'm the one, who made the change) dword
On Sun, December 3, 2017 22:10, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
>> FPC 3.0.2
>>
>> function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
>> function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : longint) : boolean;
>>
>> FPC 3.0.4
>>
>> function get_segment_bas
On Sun, December 3, 2017 19:56, kardan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:59:40 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> > If your server is able to host files you will be able to generate a
>> > checksum file *anywhere* and put it onto it.
>>
>> Yes, if somebody with shell access to the server finds to ti
On Sun, December 3, 2017 18:49, kardan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:33:04 +0100
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, December 1, 2017 00:55, kardan wrote:
>> .
>> .
>> > In your case it would be probably enough to
>> > sha256sum $FILES > SHA256SUMS.txt
>> > gpg --sign SHA256SUMS.txt
>>
>> Sorry
On 12/03/2017 11:44 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sun, December 3, 2017 22:10, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
FPC 3.0.2
function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : longint) : boolean;
FPC 3.0.4
Hi Florian!
I would like to work on this patch, can you share it with me?
Thank you,
Michael
Am 03.12.17 um 19:05 schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 29.11.2017 um 06:36 schrieb Christo:
On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Ring wrote:
I am looking for an easy way to have all cortex-m compil
Hi,
SourceForge gives checksums, too:
Cheers,
Benito
Am 30.11.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Tomas Hajny:
On Thu, November 30, 2017 15:32, kardan wrote:
Wow, both of you managed to avoid my actual question. :)
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:00:07 +0100
kardan wrote:
How can I verify those downloads
20 matches
Mail list logo
