I’m trying to translate a function from C (taken from
http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/Homepages/wrf/Research/Short_Notes/pnpoly.html) and
although I think I got it correctly it’s not behaving 100% accurately so I’m
not sure if it was my translation or not. The “for” statement is pretty
confusing to my
On 22/10/16 10:06, Ryan Joseph wrote:
j := i + 1;
might want this at the end of the loop.
Colin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> On Oct 22, 2016, at 4:45 PM, C Western wrote:
>
>> j := i + 1;
> might want this at the end of the loop.
Doing that defiantly broke it. I think “j” is being set inside the for()
construct and before each pass of the loop. The author explains the for loop
even but the fact it requires an ex
El 22/10/2016 a las 11:59, Ryan Joseph escribió:
j := i + 1;
might want this at the end of the loop.
Doing that defiantly broke it. I think “j” is being set inside the for()
construct and before each pass of the loop. The author explains the for loop
even but the fact it requires an explanat
