On 18/02/16 11:15, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
> On 18/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:55:29 +0100
>> From: Adrian Veith
>> To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
>>
>> I don't want to insist on th
Yay
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.free-pascal.social
However has not yet hit the gmane nntp hierarchy (at the time of writing this
post);
The first post it lists is the Lazarus 1.6 Announcement
Date: 2016-02-18 15:28:27 GMT (18 hours and 21 minutes ago)
So I could not subscribe to
Hello,
I have a friend here in Brazil that added the `notify` support to the FGL
lists, however he sented it to this Github PR [1].
I'm contacting him to explain how to send it to FPC bugtracker, so you can
disconsider this PR at Github. :-)
Thank you!
[1]
https://github.com/fabianosalles/freep
On 17/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:48:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Van Canneyt
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
I have asked Florian to integrate his patch anyway, he has agreed,
so I im
On 19/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:16:15 +
From: Lukasz Sokol
To:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark [OT]
Std deviation also matters:
Std dev shows that runs of Prog2 have more
Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
For info, simple loop test like
while i < 10 do
i := i + 1;
shows that the FPC code is 2 times slower than Delphi 7 and Borland C
5.5 and 4 times slower that C#.
If that's really all there is in your program, then the C# compiler
probably replaces that
Am 19.02.2016 12:45 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a friend here in Brazil that added the `notify` support to the FGL
lists, however he sented it to this Github PR [1].
I'm against that. That would negatively impact the performance of these
lists.
Regards,
Sven
_
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 19.02.2016 12:45 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a friend here in Brazil that added the `notify` support to the
> FGL lists, however he sented it to this Github PR [1].
>
> I'm against that. That would negatively impact
> Do you have any ideas why this kind of optimization is special?
Didn't Florian said that this kind of optimization has no benefit in real
world programs and will only increase compilation time?
> For info, simple loop test like
>
> while i < 10 do
> i := i + 1;
>
> shows that t
Am 19.02.2016 14:45 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
>>
>> Am 19.02.2016 12:45 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have a friend here in Brazil that added the `notify` support to the
FGL lists, however he sented it to this Github PR [1]
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
[...]
> It doesn't matter whether it is requested over here or on Mantis. I'm
> against adding notifications to the generic lists, because that will
> degrade their performance.
>
Can you send little bit sample showing this degradation? I can inf
Am 19.02.2016 20:47 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> [...]
>
>> It doesn't matter whether it is requested over here or on Mantis. I'm
against adding notifications to the generic lists, because that will
degrade their performance.
>
> Can you send litt
On 2016-02-19 23:04, Sven Barth wrote:
> There's no need for a sample. This degradation is the whole reason why the
> non-generic classes TFPObjectList and TFPList exist compared to TObjectList
> and TList which do have notifications.
I don't use Generics so it doesn't bother me either way. But pu
Hello,
Consider the following procedure:
procedure test(b: TBytes);
begin
end;
The common way to pass an array of bytes in this procedure is declaring and
initializing a TBytes variable. But in Delphi (XE) I just do:
test([65, 66, 67]);
However, when I try it on FPC (trunk), I get:
"Error:
procedure test(const b: array of byte) ??
On Friday, February 19, 2016, silvioprog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Consider the following procedure:
>
> procedure test(b: TBytes);
> begin
> end;
>
> The common way to pass an array of bytes in this procedure is declaring
> and initializing a TBytes variable.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev <
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> procedure test(const b: array of byte) ??
I know it using an array of bytes, but does it compiles if the parameter is
declared as TBytes? I don't know if FPC sopports it, so I'm askig just to
check if it i
>> Can you send little bit sample showing this degradation? I can inform him
>> to not send the patch because this problem. (I think that him isn't
>> registered here in the list yet)
>
> There's no need for a sample. This degradation is the whole reason why the
> non-generic classes TFPObjectList
2016-02-18 15:43 GMT+01:00 Mazola Winstrol :
> Em 18/02/2016 10:12, "Marco van de Voort" escreveu:
>>
>> In our previous episode, Mazola Winstrol said:
>> >end;
>> >
>> >
>> > Suppose that this class represent data of the Person table in a sql
>> > database. Suppose that there is records where
Notifications events already works in Generics.Collections. ;P
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
19 matches
Mail list logo
