On 15/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:55:55 +0100
From: Florian Kl?mpfl
To:, "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
, Adrian Veith
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
Message-ID:
<152e3b6cc90.27ef.940694a44bcba3a3e49326
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
On 15/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:55:55 +0100
From: Florian Kl?mpfl
To:, "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
, Adrian Veith
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
Message-ID:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Maybe documentation helps here.
>
> Is there already a page "pimp my fpc"?
>
In fact there's but.
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Improving_language_shootout_results
But the information is a bit outdated.
thanks,
Dmitry
Am 2016-02-14 12:42, schrieb Jürgen Hestermann:
Here we differ:
I expect that a documentation *fully* explains
a behaviour of a certain function (or something else),
not just some part of it.
IMHO that would be insane. To a programmer (like you and me) the RTL and
the Compiler are just interfa
Am 2016-02-15 um 18:21 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
> Am 2016-02-14 12:42, schrieb Jürgen Hestermann:
>> Here we differ:
>> I expect that a documentation *fully* explains
>> a behaviour of a certain function (or something else),
>> not just some part of it.
> IMHO that would be insane. To a programm
