On 03/21/2015 11:04 AM, Constantine Yannakopoulos wrote:
So no ambiguity,
As - other than in C - calling a function without empty parentheses is
allowed (and rather common, FWIW), this _is_ an ambiguity.
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas
On 03/20/2015 11:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Efficient implementation of coroutines requires CPU-specific code in
the RTL and possibly the compiler. However
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html suggests a
way that coroutines can be implemented in a portable fashion in
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 03/20/2015 11:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Efficient implementation of coroutines requires CPU-specific code in
the RTL and possibly the compiler. However
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html suggests a
way that coroutines can be implemented
On 18 March 2015 at 14:49, vfclists . wrote:
>
> I have recently compiled projects which were converted from Delphi and it
> seems to me that the passing a function as a parameter does not require the
> '@' symbol. I suspect syntax errors came because I wasn't compiling from
> the command line.
>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:13:54 +
"vfclists ." wrote:
>[...]
> More questions on Mode Delphi.
>
> 1. Does Mode Delphi simply allow Delphi syntax to be compiled, or does it
> also affect the code generation, like data structures, pointer handling,
> parameter handling / calling conventions, stac
Hi,
Do the new class helpers support objects?
If this is not implemented how much work (1-10) is it to do?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 23.03.2015 21:39, Andrew Haines wrote:
Hi,
Do the new class helpers support objects?
If this is not implemented how much work (1-10) is it to do?
No, it's currently not supported, but it wouldn't be that hard to add.
In fact that's somewhere on my ToDo list as well as helpers for interfac
