Hello.
I have a external dll. In Windows i can access perfectly the procedures with
GetProcAddress() if i use Windows unit.
If i use DynLibs unit, prog crash when i try to load the procedure.
I prefer to use DynLibs unit because i want to use the dll for Linux too (of
course with library.so).
I
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
Hello.
I have a external dll. In Windows i can access perfectly the procedures with
GetProcAddress() if i use Windows unit.
If i use DynLibs unit, prog crash when i try to load the procedure.
I prefer to use DynLibs unit because i want to use the
On Mon, January 13, 2014 11:47, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a external dll. In Windows i can access perfectly the procedures
> with
> GetProcAddress() if i use Windows unit.
>
> If i use DynLibs unit, prog crash when i try to load the procedure.
> I prefer to use DynLibs unit becaus
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:58:21 +0100
> From: mich...@freepascal.org
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
>
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have a external dll. In Win
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>>> Here part of NOT working code (if i call soundtouch_createInstance, it
crash)
...
uses
dynlibs ;
...
var
soundtouch_createInstance : function() : THandle; stdcall;
...
procedure InitLib(LibFile : PAnsiChar);
begin
LibHandle:=DynLibs.Load
I had a look at armv6m yesterday evening, parts of my code run fine in
gdb, the code crashes in the init of a procedure when trying to prepare
the access to contents of a set.
The address of the set seems to get calculated totally wrong ending up
in a memory access at the end of the chip's addre
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:07:54 +0100
> From: xhaj...@hajny.biz
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
>
> On Mon, January 13, 2014 11:47, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have a external dll. In Windows
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Mon, January 13, 2014 11:47, Fred van Stappen wrote:
Hello.
I have a external dll. In Windows i can access perfectly the procedures
with
GetProcAddress() if i use Windows unit.
If i use DynLibs unit, prog crash when i try to load the procedure.
I prefer to use DynLibs uni
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:32:53 +0100
From: mich...@freepascal.org
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> >>> Here part of NOT working code (if i call soundtouch_crea
I created a TMemoField in TBufDataSet but no matter I do:
1) Field.asString := 'some value'
or
2) Field.LoadFromStream(someStream).
Afterwards, this F.AsString always returns ''
and
F.LoadFromStream(someStream) always has a 0 BlobSize afterwards.
Anyone has similar experience?
Dennis
___
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:32:53 +0100
From: mich...@freepascal.org
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> >>> Here part
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:32:53 +0100
> From: mich...@freepascal.org
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
>
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> >
On 13/01/2014 12:34, Michael Ring wrote:
> I had a look at armv6m yesterday evening, parts of my code run fine in
> gdb, the code crashes in the init of a procedure when trying to prepare
> the access to contents of a set.
> The address of the set seems to get calculated totally wrong ending up
> i
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > begin
> > LibHandle:=DynLibs.LoadLibrary(libfilename);
> > if LibHandle <> DynLibs.NilHandle then
> >
> > Pointer(soundtouch_createInstance) :=
DynLibs.GetProcedureAddress(LibHandle, PAnsiChar('soundtouch_createInstance
'));
>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > > begin
> > > LibHandle:=DynLibs.LoadLibrary(libfilename);
> > > if LibHandle <> DynLibs.NilHandle then
> > >
> > > Pointer(soundtouch_createInstance):=
> > > DynLibs.GetProcedureAddress(LibHandle,
> > > PAnsiChar('soundtouch_c
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > > begin
> > > LibHandle:=DynLibs.LoadLibrary(libfilename);
> > > if LibHandle <> DynLibs.NilHandle then
> > >
> > > Pointer(soundtouch_createInstance) :=
DynLibs.GetProcedureAddre
Hi,
'scue me if I did not catch something, but
On 13/01/14 12:13, Fred van Stappen wrote:
[...]
>> > procedure InitLib(LibFile : PAnsiChar);
>> > begin
>> > LibHandle:=DynLibs.LoadLibrary(libfilename);
>> > if LibHandle <> DynLibs.NilHandle then
>> >
>> > Pointer(soundtouch_createInsta
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
>
> > > > begin
> > > > LibHandle:=DynLibs.LoadLibrary(libfilename);
> > > > if LibHandle <> DynLibs.NilHandle then
> > > >
> > > > Pointer(soundtouch_createInstance):=
> > > > Dyn
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> From: el.es...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:52:51 +
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
>
> Hi,
>
> 'scue me if I did not catch something, but
>
> On 13/01/14 12:13, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> [...]
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> From: el.es...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:52:51 +
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
>
> Hi,
>
> 'scue me if I did not catch something, but
>
> On 13/01/14 12:13, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> [...]
Might be related to the mla/mls optimization which somehow has been enabled
even though it's still broken
- Reply message -
Fra: "Reinier Olislagers"
Dato: man., jan. 13, 2014 13:44
Emne: [fpc-pascal] ARM Linux crosscompiler: compiles but... executable gives
segmentation fault
Til:
On
I guess not, when I remember correctly this has already been repaired
for armv6m. The problem for me is that .Lj9 is defined as a negative
number. As a consequence r13 points to nirvana and
str r0,[r13, #8] creates an Exception.
# [87] begin
push{r4,r14}
ldr r4,.Lj
On 13/01/14 13:36, Fred van Stappen wrote:
[...]
> Hello Lucaz
>
> /// why not just :
>>
>> @soundtouch_createInstance := DynLibs.GetProcedureAddress(LibHandle,
>> PAnsiChar('soundtouch_createInstance'));
>>
>
> Get that error :
>
>>> libSoundTouch.pas(56,5) Error: Can't assign values to an ad
AFAIR this is so. (we can call it bug ;-))
Data are not there until you Post record.
After Post you will see data there, right?
-Laco.
I created a TMemoField in TBufDataSet but no matter I do:
1) Field.asString := 'some value'
or
2) Field.LoadFromStream(someStream).
Afterwards, this F.AsString
All the other usual types (e.g. integer, string, datetime) work except
ftMemo and ftblob.
Yes, I have used POST
Dennis
LacaK wrote:
AFAIR this is so. (we can call it bug ;-))
Data are not there until you Post record.
After Post you will see data there, right?
-Laco.
___
Hello and many thanks to help.
Here demo to show the problem (i hope).
>> https://sites.google.com/site/fiensprototyping/dynlib_vs_windows.zip
There is a program : test.pas
It uses a external library soundtouch_2.dll.
There are 2 wrappers :
soundtouch_windows.pas (who uses windows unit) and
so
From: fi...@hotmail.com
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:33:47 +0100
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
Hello and many thanks to help.
Here demo to show the problem (i hope).
>> https://sites.google.com/site/fiensprototy
> All the other usual types (e.g. integer, string, datetime) work Yes it is expected behavior>except ftMemo and ftblob.> Yes it is not consistent and from my POV it is bug.I will look (next week or two) if it can be fixed, but I have doubts, that it will not be so easy :-))-Laco.
__
On 13 Jan 2014, at 17:33, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Hello and many thanks to help.
>
> Here demo to show the problem (i hope).
>
> >> https://sites.google.com/site/fiensprototyping/dynlib_vs_windows.zip
in the dynlibs version, why do you use `PChar(1)` or `PChar(2)` [or ]
instead of the
From: ew...@yellowcouch.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:25:27 +0100
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
On 13 Jan 2014, at 17:33, Fred van Stappen wrote:Hello and many thanks to help.
Here demo to show the problem (i
On 13 Jan 2014, at 23:06, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> The SoundTouch.dll uses index to call the procedures.
>
> Like that :
> [Ordinal/Name Pointer]
> [ 0] soundtouch_clear
> [ 1] soundtouch_createInstance
> [ 2] soundtouch_destroyInstance
>
That explains why it works in win
fred, can you please adjust your quoting to use the standard '>' for previous
responses and then add your response below? you do add your response below but
the quote is the exact of the previous and it is very hard to read only your
responses when the previous is not prefixed by '>'... thanks
Thanks, I will give them a go. -b
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 10 Jan 2014, at 01:13, Bruce Tulloch wrote:
>
> What is the recommended way to profile FPC applications run on ARM targets
>>
>
> Callgrind and cachegrind (both part of Valgrind) are probably the best
33 matches
Mail list logo
