On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
> FWIW: i learned a while back (from the lazarus list i think) to perform
> "make clean" before "svn up" because the make files may have changed and the
> new ones may not know where the old files resided...
>
> performing "make clean" first clea
On 17/08/2013 10:44, Juha Manninen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, waldo kitty
> wrote:
>> performing "make clean" first clears the existing directories... then "svn
>> up" followed (possibly with another "make clean" and then) by your normal
>> build flow should result in a truly clean
On 17 Aug 2013, at 10:44, Juha Manninen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
>> FWIW: i learned a while back (from the lazarus list i think) to perform
>> "make clean" before "svn up" because the make files may have changed and the
>> new ones may not know where the old f
On 8/17/2013 04:44, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
FWIW: i learned a while back (from the lazarus list i think) to perform
"make clean" before "svn up" because the make files may have changed and the
new ones may not know where the old files resided...
On 8/17/2013 04:57, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Also, there have been oversights in the past in what gets cleaned by
make clean, so I usually do a recursive delete of .a, .o, .ppu followed
by e.g. an svn revert -R or svn up to get any files back that are required.
right... that's why clean should
On 17/08/2013 12:33, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 8/17/2013 04:57, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Also, there have been oversights in the past in what gets cleaned by
>> make clean, so I usually do a recursive delete of .a, .o, .ppu followed
>> by e.g. an svn revert -R or svn up to get any files back that
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> > the old .a .o .ppu files are removed and then the update can move the
> > sources to another directory as well as updating the makefile for the
> > new files' locations...
>
> I appear to be unclear. The makefile sometimes does not specify all
On 17/08/2013 13:46, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>>> the old .a .o .ppu files are removed and then the update can move the
>>> sources to another directory as well as updating the makefile for the
>>> new files' locations...
>>
>> I appear to be unc
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> >> .a/.o files to clean. Therefore make clean does not clean all .a/.o
> >> files, i.e. does not work, i.e. doing just make clean is not always enough.
> >
> > That's what make distclean is for.
>
> Which doesn't always work, as I mentioned.
It
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> "make clean" is not about the source files. Waldo is right: you should always
> "make clean" (or even better: "make distclean") before updating from svn,
> because files may move around and then "make clean" will only clean their
> object an
On 8/17/2013 07:35, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
I appear to be unclear. The makefile sometimes does not specify all
.a/.o files to clean. Therefore make clean does not clean all .a/.o
files, i.e. does not work, i.e. doing just make clean is not always enough.
no, you are perfectly clear... clean
On 17/08/2013 19:34, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 8/17/2013 07:35, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> As for the "update can move the sources to another directory" etc: no
>> idea what you're talking about there
>
> :( think about it... you have a source tree like this
> you have refined mylib.pas to t
12 matches
Mail list logo
