On 11.05.2013 05:35, Fred van Stappen wrote:
On 5/8/2013 04:34, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>> PS : It is a shame that FPC does not care about assistive technology.
No, it is a shame for me to have had doubts about fpc...
FPC is assistive technology compatible. ( $(freepascal
source)/packages/gtk2/
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to make an application that need to be FHS compliant. For that I
want be abble to pass some strings as compile time parameters (eg. the famous
$PREFIX). I tryed this :
// installation paths defines
{$if undefined(PREFIX)}
{$DEFINE PREFIX:='/usr/local'}
{$endif}
Turn macros on
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse4.html
Stephano
On 11/05/13 15:14, Geoffray Levasseur-Brandin wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to make an application that need to be FHS compliant. For that I
want be abble to pass some strings as compile time parameters (eg. the fa
On 11/05/13 15:31, patspiper wrote:
Turn macros on
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse4.html
and use not defined instead of undefined
Stephano
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman
> That is only ATK, not AT-SPI directly.
Ok, what a jungle.
ATK is Accessibility Toolkit no ?
I was thinking that with atk, you can use at-spi library more easier.
Also it seams that Qt use ATK for accessibility.
So, maybe, is it a good idea to use atk for pure fpc-console app (like fpGUI ) ?
On 10-5-2013 14:15, Dennis Poon wrote:
> Any one has any idea?
When opening a new thread, please do not respond to an existing thread.
Write a new message to the list to start a new thread.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
ht
On 11.05.2013 15:02, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> That is only ATK, not AT-SPI directly.
Ok, what a jungle.
ATK is Accessibility Toolkit no ?
I was thinking that with atk, you can use at-spi library more easier.
Also it seams that Qt use ATK for accessibility.
So, maybe, is it a good idea to use
>>But better port AT-SPI completely over to Pascal...Aaarg, i promise to do it,
>>so i have to do it...
( I was hoping that using a existing ATK pascal header and adapt it for
console, but too many reference to GTK libs ( or Qt for the Qt atk-kit ).
So, lot of white nights in perspective... ;)
>> Or put up a bounty...Yes, i think it is the best solution ;)
PS : Hum,... how much ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 11.05.2013 21:50, Fred van Stappen wrote:
Or put up a bounty...
Yes, i think it is the best solution ;)
PS : Hum,... how much ?
I've never taken a bounty nor published one, so I can't tell. You'll
need to judge how much a solution is worth for you and how much you
think a developer will
>You'll need to judge how much a solution is worth for you and how much >you
>think a developer will need so that he'll take the "challenge".
The thing is that i discover AT-SPI one week ago. Somebody tell me that he (his
factory) does not use fpc because there was no link for AT-SPI.
So i have
Fred van Stappen wrote:
You'll need to judge how much a solution is worth for you and how much >you think a
developer will need so that he'll take the "challenge".
The thing is that i discover AT-SPI one week ago. Somebody tell me that he (his
factory) does not use fpc because there was no l
12 matches
Mail list logo
