Am 25.02.2013 07:14 schrieb "Eric Kom" :
>
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
It's mostly a historical difference..pas are units that could (originally)
be compiled with Turbo Pascal as well (which is why all units of the
compiler use .pas) while .pp
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 07:14 schrieb "Eric Kom" :
>
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
It's mostly a historical difference..pas are units that could (originally) be
compiled with Turbo Pascal as well (which is why
Hi,
on documentation
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progap7.html#x316-331000G
there is : Classic Macintosh MAC
but in sources is used: MACOS
So may be, that documentation should be updated ?
TIA
-Laco.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@l
On 25.02.2013 09:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 07:14 schrieb "Eric Kom"
:
>
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
It's mostly a historical difference..pas are units that could
(originally) be c
On Mon, February 25, 2013 11:40, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 25.02.2013 09:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
.
.
>>> Today .pp is used for example for FPC's test files (also for new ones)
>>> out if habit.
>>
>> I think you are under a misapprehension. It is not
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
On 25.02.2013 09:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 07:14 schrieb "Eric Kom"
:
>
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
It's mostly a historical difference.
On 25.02.2013 11:49, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
On 25.02.2013 09:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 07:14 schrieb "Eric Kom"
:
>
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files
On 2013-02-24 17:35, Andrew Brunner wrote:
>
> If not, does anyone have lightning fast scaling methods in C++ or Java
> that I can port/contribute?
A fpGUI user did a speed comparison of a lot of various image libraries
and pure Object Pascal imaging code. I can find the link to his work and
res
On 2013-02-25 10:51, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> That's indeed a valid argument pro .pp
And a large argument against .pp extensions is that NO editor out there
(except for FP Text IDE and Lazarus) knows about .pp, so pascal syntax
highlighting never works. You have to always manually force the pascal
s
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-02-25 10:51, Sven Barth wrote:
That's indeed a valid argument pro .pp
And a large argument against .pp extensions is that NO editor out there
(except for FP Text IDE and Lazarus) knows about .pp, so pascal syntax
highlighting never work
Hi all,
Hoping you fpweb gurus know the answer by heart:
Say I have an fpweb CGI server with action documents registered and I
GET http://server/cgi-bin/tigercgi/documents/301/
1. How do instruct the documents action to handle that? Currently I get
a Error: Could not determine HTTP module for req
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:00:25AM +, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-02-25 10:51, Sven Barth wrote:
> >
> > That's indeed a valid argument pro .pp
>
> And a large argument against .pp extensions is that NO editor out there
> (except for FP Text IDE and Lazarus) knows about .pp, so pascal
On 2/25/13, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> And a large argument against .pp extensions is that NO editor out there
> (except for FP Text IDE and Lazarus) knows about .pp,
LazEdit (or EPlus)?
Bart
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-02-25 10:51, Sven Barth wrote:
That's indeed a valid argument pro .pp
And a large argument against .pp extensions is that NO editor out there
(except for FP Text IDE and Lazarus) knows about .pp, so pascal syntax
highlighting never works. You have to always man
On 2013-02-25 11:09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> That is a bug in these editors, you should file a report.
Kate, gEdit, syn, mcedit, vim, emacs, Notepad++, Geany etc... I wouldn't
even know where to start finding all their bug tracker information. And
honestly, I simply don't have the time. Us
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Hi all,
Hoping you fpweb gurus know the answer by heart:
Say I have an fpweb CGI server with action documents registered and I
GET http://server/cgi-bin/tigercgi/documents/301/
1. How do instruct the documents action to handle that? Currently I
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-02-25 11:09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That is a bug in these editors, you should file a report.
Kate, gEdit, syn, mcedit, vim, emacs, Notepad++, Geany etc... I wouldn't
even know where to start finding all their bug tracker informatio
On 2013-02-25 12:39, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> Somehow, tongue-in-cheek humour never seems to work through email...
Nope.
> Or I'm just no good at it.
Neither am I. :)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/
On 25-2-2013 13:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Say I have an fpweb CGI server with action documents registered and I
>> GET http://server/cgi-bin/tigercgi/documents/301/
>> 1. How do instruct the documents action to handle that? Currently I get
>>
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 25-2-2013 13:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Say I have an fpweb CGI server with action documents registered and I
GET http://server/cgi-bin/tigercgi/documents/301/
1. How do instruct the document
Hi,
Noticed that the user changes for FPC trunk mentions UPX has been removed:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#UPX_support_has_been_removed
However, it's also mentioned in 2.6.2:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.6.2#UPX_support_has_been_removed
Can we remo
On 25-2-2013 14:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
>> On 25-2-2013 13:38, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Say I have an fpweb CGI server with action documents registered and I
GET http://server/c
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> Noticed that the user changes for FPC trunk mentions UPX has been removed:
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#UPX_support_has_been_removed
>
>
> However, it's also mentioned in 2.6.2:
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Use
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:36:18 +
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Kate, gEdit, syn, mcedit, vim, emacs, Notepad++, Geany etc... I wouldn't
> even know where to start finding all their bug tracker information. And
> honestly, I simply don't have the time. Using .pas is just simpler.
It's mostly not t
On 02/25/2013 04:51 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
ImageMagick will probably be a good choice. Regards, - Graeme -
Ok, I'm going to start tests with that. Thanks
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/m
Ok, This matter has been solved.
The updated code is so simple and many factors faster!
Thanks to all!
class function Image.Transform(Stream:TMemoryStream; var
iX,iY:Integer):boolean;
var
status : MagickBooleanType;
wand : PMagickWand;
srcWidth,srcHeight : Ca
On 2/25/2013 00:34, Eric Kom wrote:
Good day,
Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
IIRC, pp is objectpascal whereas pas is "general" pascal...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
On 2/25/2013 02:31, silvioprog wrote:
2013/2/25 Reinier Olislagers mailto:reinierolislag...@gmail.com>>
On 25-2-2013 6:34, Eric Kom wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
As Ralf said: 2 letters. I have the idea .pp was us
Hello,
I gave today a lecture named "database-free applications"[1].
The lecture explain an idea of how to design complex systems and break
them apart etc...
The lecture is in English and so does my slide notes, and I think that
people here can enjoy the idea as well.
[1] https://github.com/ik5/
On 25.02.2013 21:57, ik wrote:
Hello,
I gave today a lecture named "database-free applications"[1].
The lecture explain an idea of how to design complex systems and break
them apart etc...
The lecture is in English and so does my slide notes, and I think that
people here can enjoy the idea as w
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:20:23 +0100
Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> see the following little program:
>
> program argumentbug;
>
> {$MODE ObjFpc}
>
> uses classes;
>
> type
>
> TVector3 = packed record
> X, Y, Z: Single;
> end;
>
> TClassA = class
> protected
> fVector: TVector3;
> pu
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:54:51 +0100
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:20:23 +0100
> Reimar Grabowski wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > see the following little program:
> >
> > program argumentbug;
> >
> > {$MODE ObjFpc}
> >
> > uses classes;
> >
> > type
> >
> > TVector3 = packed re
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> On 25.02.2013 21:57, ik wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I gave today a lecture named "database-free applications"[1].
>> The lecture explain an idea of how to design complex systems and break
>> them apart etc...
>>
>> The lecture is in English and s
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:59:26 +0100
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> And it works under 2.7.1 rev 23661:
> TClassB: 0.0E+00, 0.0E+00, 3.0E+00
Thanks for the info. Updating now.
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:59:26 +0100
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > And it works under 2.7.1 rev 23661:
Even with 23662 it does not work for me compiling from Lazarus. But from
command line it works. So it is not a FPC problem.
Sorry for the noise.
Investigating further.
R.
__
On 2013-02-25 20:22, waldo kitty wrote:
>
> for instance:
> DOS: foo.exe
> OS2: foop.exe
> WIN: foow.exe
> LNX: fool.exe
I quite like this idea. I have always hated *nix systems that don't use
extensions for executables. Rather hard to quickly search for
executables in a directory hierarchy, whe
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> I quite like this idea. I have always hated *nix systems that don't use
> extensions for executables. Rather hard to quickly search for
> executables in a directory hierarchy, where with a file extension it is
> much easier.
find -type
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:02:33 +0100
Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> But from command line it works. So it is not a FPC problem.
I am really sorry for communicating with myself but I have spoken too early.
Now I can reproduce the problem using just FPC, no Lazarus involved.
It gets triggered when compil
At 12:19 PM 2/25/2013, waldo kitty wrote:
On 2/25/2013 00:34, Eric Kom wrote:
Good day,
Please what is a difference between .pp and .pas files extension?
IIRC, pp is objectpascal whereas pas is "general" pascal...
There is no "is", it's all up to you what kind of convention you use.
From t
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:02:33 +0100
> Reimar Grabowski wrote:
>
>> But from command line it works. So it is not a FPC problem.
> I am really sorry for communicating with myself but I have spoken too early.
> Now I can reproduce the probl
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:45:37 +0100
Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:02:33 +0100
> Reimar Grabowski wrote:
>
> > But from command line it works. So it is not a FPC problem.
> I am really sorry for communicating with myself but I have spoken too early.
> Now I can reproduce the p
41 matches
Mail list logo
