Hi Michael (or anybody else that could help),
I'm using fpdoc from FPC 2.7.1 (pulled yesterday from the repository).
I have a xml description file with the following elements.
--[ fpg_button.xml ]-
---[ end ]---
What is the correct format for
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael (or anybody else that could help),
I have a xml description file with the following elements.
The first one (for ImageName property) which doesn't list the unit name
in the link attribute, is never found by fpdoc. So the generated
docum
On 2012-12-04 16:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> Well, I've had some issues myself, but never managed to pinpoint the
> exact reason. Somehow, when trying to construct test cases, the problem
> does not pop up: it proves to be very elusive.
I'll dig deeper and see what I can find. This bug
Hi,
Is there an option in fpdoc description files to exclude a class, type,
global variable, global procedure etc from documentation?
Something like PasDoc's @exclude functionality?
I just want to know if it already exists, or if somebody is already
working on this, before I start on it.
Rega
Hi,
This seems new in FPC 2.7.1. I have some 15-20 units in my .xml project
file that fpdoc uses, but only a select few units generate output like
"Parsing used unit ..."
What does that output mean? Is in some error? And why the output only
for a few units, and not all units?
8<
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Is there an option in fpdoc description files to exclude a class, type,
global variable, global procedure etc from documentation?
Something like PasDoc's @exclude functionality?
I just want to know if it already exists, or if somebody is alr
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
This seems new in FPC 2.7.1. I have some 15-20 units in my .xml project
file that fpdoc uses, but only a select few units generate output like
"Parsing used unit ..."
What does that output mean? Is in some error? And why the output only
for a
On 2012-12-04 16:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> Imagine unit A and unit B. Unit A references unit B.
> You create somewhere in A's documentation a link to an identifier in unit B.
OK thanks. I'll try and reorder my units in the project file to see if
this can be improved.
I thought order wa
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-12-04 16:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Imagine unit A and unit B. Unit A references unit B.
You create somewhere in A's documentation a link to an identifier in unit B.
OK thanks. I'll try and reorder my units in the project file to see
Hi,
See the code below.
My question is: Why the cast worked, considering the c variable is a
TAClass instance, not a TBClass.
-
program Project1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
Classes, SysUtils;
type
TAClass = class
protected
FInfoA: string;
public
constructor Create;
On 04.12.2012 20:03, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Hi,
See the code below.
My question is: Why the cast worked, considering the c variable is a
TAClass instance, not a TBClass.
As long as you don't access fields of TBClass inside of GetInfoA you
won't run into problems, because FInfoA is accessed usi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 04.12.2012 20:03, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> See the code below.
>> My question is: Why the cast worked, considering the c variable is a
>> TAClass instance, not a TBClass.
>
>
> As long as you don't access fields of TBClass inside
2012/12/4 Marcos Douglas
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> > On 04.12.2012 20:03, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> See the code below.
> >> My question is: Why the cast worked, considering the c variable is a
> >> TAClass instance, not a TBClass.
> >
> >
> > As
13 matches
Mail list logo
