fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org

2012-07-23 Thread leledumbo
Yep, the embedded http server. It's been reported: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22260 -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Nginx-FastCGI-and-module-action-vs-module-module-action-action-tp5710411p5710421.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Gen

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-23 Thread OBones
leledumbo wrote: I look at the generated code and in the direct one there's additional overhead of decrementing the reference counter on each iteration. I see it too now (I forgot about the -a option). I can understand why there is a call to the decrementer outside the loop when using the varia

[fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-23 Thread leledumbo
That one I cannot answer, please summon Florian/Jonas/Marco/Michael/whoever capable to answer -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/UnicodeString-comparison-performance-tp5710405p5710423.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-23 Thread OBones
leledumbo wrote: That one I cannot answer, please summon Florian/Jonas/Marco/Michael/whoever capable to answer Would you happen to know the magical words/rhunes that I should use? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lis

fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org

2012-07-23 Thread leledumbo
Seems like the old IncludeHTTPPathDelimiter bug strikes back (AFAIR it's been closed when I said Marco's patch works), I need to change: procedure RegisterFileLocation(const ALocation,ADirectory: String); begin ... if (ADirectory='') then Locations.Values[IncludeTrailingPathDelimiter(ALoca

[fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-passrc package question about source file and line number info

2012-07-23 Thread Seth Grover
> Fixed, plus a couple of others as well. Revision 21942. > Thanks, it's a great help. > Michael. I pulled the latest this morning and ran it over my whole project (about 140 units, 600,000-ish lines of code) and didn't get any more segfaults and it seems like all the information I'm pulling out o

[fpc-pascal] FPC and IPv6, and BSD

2012-07-23 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
I'm trying to write a simple finger daemon, capable of both IP4 and IP6. At present it's using an unprivileged socket so as to avoid problems on unix platforms. I appear to be having problems at the bind() call for IP6 (returns -1), which I suspect is down to my incomplete understanding of the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-23 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 23 Jul 2012, at 10:58, OBones wrote: > leledumbo wrote: >> I look at the generated code and in the direct one there's additional >> overhead of decrementing the reference counter on each iteration. > I see it too now (I forgot about the -a option). > I can understand why there is a call to the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-23 Thread OBones
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 23 Jul 2012, at 10:58, OBones wrote: leledumbo wrote: I look at the generated code and in the direct one there's additional overhead of decrementing the reference counter on each iteration. I see it too now (I forgot about the -a option). I can understand why there is a

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC and IPv6, and BSD

2012-07-23 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: I'm trying to write a simple finger daemon, capable of both IP4 and IP6. At present it's using an unprivileged socket so as to avoid problems on unix platforms. I appear to be having problems at the bind() call for IP6 (returns -1), which I suspect is down to my incom