Am 28.02.2012 08:38, schrieb Noah Silva:
Windows supports multiple locales and has 95% of the
computer market -
Not really: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems
Anyway, if we did everything the way Microsoft suggested, we would give
up real sym links and litte
Hi Sven,
>From what I've read, the NT kernel (and filesystem) support a lot of things
that Windows in general doesn't. Presumably this is because it is
(unofficially, of course) loosely based on VMS, but Win32 was originally
designed to work with DOS, etc.
Thank you,
Noah Silva
2012/2/28 S
Am 28.02.2012 09:47, schrieb Noah Silva:
Hi Sven,
From what I've read, the NT kernel (and filesystem) support a lot of
things that Windows in general doesn't. Presumably this is because it
is (unofficially, of course) loosely based on VMS, but Win32 was
originally designed to work with DOS, et
Hi Max,
I haven't used Shell(), and I am sure others can help you there. However,
I can think of at least two alternatives:
1. Use pexec() directly
2. Use TProcess or TUTF8Process.
Thank you,
Noah Silva
2012/2/28 max
> With the advent of Debian6 fpc 2.4.0-2 has become the only availab
Hi Sven,
It seems that since NT is the only remaining Windows kernel now that it
might make sense to use NT functions in (for example) the normal SysUtils
library for more efficient implementations - do you think there is any
strong reason not to?
You have to figure there are two layers of thunki
Am 28.02.2012 08:22, schrieb Noah Silva:
Well ObjectPascal has been around since the early 90s at least, and from
an end-user point of view, pascal became primarily Object Oriented with
TurboVision and later Delphi in the mid 90s - so anyone who doesn't know
about that is severely misinformed. I
Am 28.02.2012 10:03, schrieb Noah Silva:
Hi Sven,
It seems that since NT is the only remaining Windows kernel now that it
might make sense to use NT functions in (for example) the normal
SysUtils library for more efficient implementations - do you think there
is any strong reason not to?
You ha
Sven,
Wow, you should buy him a book on Delphi. I would say on FPC, but the main FPC
book is only to be had by mail order - I keep hoping they will offer it in
Kindle format or such.
-- Noah
On 2012/02/28, at 18:05, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 08:22, schrieb Noah Silva:
>> Well Obj
Hi,
Can everyone please take this topic to the fpc-other list? It has no
longer anything to do with FPC.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo
On 26/02/2012 11:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:43:38 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Vinzent Höfler wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:15:54 +0100, ik
>>> wrote:
>>>
I found the following amazing lecture that present a ne
2012/2/27 Jürgen Hestermann :
> Virgo Pärna schrieb:
>
>> Essentialy, case insensitive filesystems are less problematic.
>>
>
> No, just the opposite. The problems are only moved (and increased) from the
> techie level (where it should belong to) to the user.
> This is not a good idea IMO.
> If
On 27 Feb 2012, at 13:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 26/02/2012 11:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The next step is to "compile" the function on every change. Easy with
an interpreter. How to compile only one function of a big program and
insert/replace it?
Sorry for a plug, but MS V
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask this question since many months ago. Why do
I get that ". did you forget -T?" whenever I compile any project.
It never used to be there (months ago).
-
...snip...
Compiling ./apps/ide/replacedialogform_mfm.pas
Compiling ./apps/ide/sourcehi
Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Hi,
I've been meaning to ask this question since many months ago. Why do
I get that ". did you forget -T?" whenever I compile any project.
It never used to be there (months ago).
-
...snip...
Compiling ./apps/ide/repla
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>
> I've been meaning to ask this question since many months ago. Why do
> I get that ". did you forget -T?" whenever I compile any project.
> It never used to be there (months ago).
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#unix-ld219
___
On 28 February 2012 13:09, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#unix-ld219
OK, so I must just ignore that output then. Is there no way to hide
that linker output.
PS:
I'm using ld 2.20.1-system.20100303 as supplied by Ubuntu 10.04.4 (64-bit).
Thanks for the info.
--
Reg
On 28 February 2012 11:05, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> To stress this a bit: around two weeks ago I told my "program optimization"
> teacher (who's the head of the "programing languages" chair) about Free
> Pascal (and Delphi) and he didn't know that Pascal "already" supports OOP...
> :(
That seems to b
On 28 February 2012 12:18, Noa Shiruba wrote:
>
> I would say on FPC, but the main FPC book is only to be had by mail order
Give him a copy of the FPC Language Reference pdf document.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pas
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Lars wrote:
> Frank Church wrote:
>> 5. This requires an increase in the uptake of Pascal. I mean if a language
>> like D can get so much attention and have libraries being created for it
>> why can't Pascal which has been longer established.
>>
>
> Another langua
Am 28.02.2012 12:20, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 28 February 2012 13:09, Sven Barth wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#unix-ld219
OK, so I must just ignore that output then. Is there no way to hide
that linker output.
AFAIK there is no option for that...
Regards,
Sven
_
But is used like one. Why is that so?
2012/2/24 Jonas Maebe
>
> On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:07, Everton Vieira wrote:
>
> > static; should be a keyword, doesn't?
>
> No, it's not a keyword.
>
>
> Jonas
> ___
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepas
On 28 Feb 2012, at 13:25, Everton Vieira wrote:
2012/2/24 Jonas Maebe
On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:07, Everton Vieira wrote:
static; should be a keyword, doesn't?
No, it's not a keyword.
But is used like one. Why is that so?
It's not used like one. Keyword means "it's a reserved word by the
I see. I only said so because i thought would became more pretty if his
was bolded like de inline next to him.
2012/2/28 Jonas Maebe
>
> On 28 Feb 2012, at 13:25, Everton Vieira wrote:
>
> 2012/2/24 Jonas Maebe
>>
>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:07, Everton Vieira wrote:
>>>
>>> static; should be a
Am 28.02.2012 14:13, schrieb Everton Vieira:
I see. I only said so because i thought would became more pretty if his
was bolded like de inline next to him.
If this is your problem then you should ask this on the Lazarus list.
This is a problem of the highlighter not of the compiler.
Note: T
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.02.2012 12:20, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 28 February 2012 13:09, Sven Barth wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#unix-ld219
OK, so I must just ignore that output then. Is there no way to hide
that linker output.
AFAIK there is no option for that...
| gr
On 28/02/2012 10:45, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 27 Feb 2012, at 13:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>
>> On 26/02/2012 11:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>> The next step is to "compile" the function on every change. Easy
>>> with an interpreter. How to compile only one function of a big
>>> program and inser
Is true, in that case here isn't the place. But nice that why isn't a
keyword is clear now.
2012/2/28 Sven Barth
> Am 28.02.2012 14:13, schrieb Everton Vieira:
>
> I see. I only said so because i thought would became more pretty if his
>> was bolded like de inline next to him.
>>
>>
> If this i
On 28 Feb 2012, at 14:36, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 28/02/2012 10:45, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Apple supported that in older versions of their development tools,
and it worked as well (or as badly) with FPC as it did with GCC. It
required changes to their dynamic linker (for the code replacement)
and
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Noah Silva
wrote:
>
> If you want to convince people to use FPC and are having issues, you should
> ask them what features, exactly, they are looking for. Chances are that FPC
> has them. (If they want a functional language, though, then you're out of
> luck).
P
To stress this a bit: around two weeks ago I told my "program
optimization" teacher (who's the head of the "programing languages"
chair) about Free Pascal (and Delphi) and he didn't know that Pascal
"already" supports OOP... :(
don't be so sad... pass your exams, whatever it takes to, then rethi
30 matches
Mail list logo
