Hi,
I stumbled upon the following. No idea where this FTP server lives,
but the link came from the Free Pascal documentation downloads page.
Anyway, while browsing there, I came across FPK (what is now known as
FPC) v0.2 source code release. 17 units in total and all console
output is German text
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>
> Anyway, while browsing there, I came across FPK (what is now known as
> FPC) v0.2 source code release. 17 units in total and all console
> output is German text. This release was way before I (and probably
> most of you) even knew Free Pascal ex
Hello,
I havent seen an answer for this in the other thread and it is getting
too big. So, in fpdoc if we make a link like this:
It does not properly link the short description when listing elements
of a class, for example.
Is this a bug or should it work like this?
Is it possible to link the
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Hello,
I havent seen an answer for this in the other thread and it is getting
too big. So, in fpdoc if we make a link like this:
It does not properly link the short description when listing elements
of a class, for example.
Is this a
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:06 AM, wrote:
> Most likely a bug, please report it.
umm, now I have rebuilt the docs and it obtained the short description
in the top-level view. I think I was using an old version of fpdoc ...
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
Aha! I found the gotcha!
If I write the link like this:
Then it links properly (clicking makes it go to
TCustomRadioGroup.OnSelectionChanged) but it will not copy the short
description to the class overview. But it does that if I link like
this:
Hi list,
On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
Would it be possible to upload one, or can I use the 2.4.2 compiler to
compile FPC 2.6.x/2.7.x sources on Windows?
Thanks,
Reinier
_
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
> lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
That being said, for windows it
On 27-1-2012 13:01, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>> On ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.0/bootstrap/ there are a
>> lot of bootstrap compilers, but I miss a x86 Windows bootstrap compiler.
>
> It is the responsibility of the platform mainta
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> > It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
> >
> > That being said, for windows it makes less sense than for other platforms,
> > since the release also contains (possibly updated) binutils.
> Ok. I'm wondering whether
On 27-1-2012 13:22, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>>> It is the responsibility of the platform maintainers to upload that.
>>>
>>> That being said, for windows it makes less sense than for other platforms,
>>> since the release also contains (possibly
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> >> binutils as the ones available at
> >> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk/install/binw32/...
> >
> > _Probably_ the same. But the ones from 2.6.0 are the _guaranteed_ working
> > ones.
>
>
> That's what I suspected. So when buildin
On 27-1-2012 13:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>> That's what I suspected. So when building a Win32 system from scratch,
>> I'd have to either extract the files from the installer or perhaps get
>> them from a stable branch like:
>> http://svn.free
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
> >
> > No, tags/release_2_6_0 would then be the one. What is currently already in
> > fixed could theoretically already have been changed for 2.6.2
> >
> Thanks, Marco; I thought 2.6.1 fixes would be stability improvements to
> 2.6.
True. But bo
Op 27 januari 2012 14:00 heeft Marco van de Voort
het volgende geschreven:
> One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install the
> release anyway at the first hickup.
I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk to be able to build fpc/trunk
better than the release ones, otherwi
On 27-1-2012 14:00, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:
>>>
>>> No, tags/release_2_6_0 would then be the one. What is currently already in
>>> fixed could theoretically already have been changed for 2.6.2
>>>
>> Thanks, Marco; I thought 2.6.1 fixes would be
In our previous episode, Vincent Snijders said:
> > One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install the
> > release anyway at the first hickup.
>
> I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk to be able to build fpc/trunk
> better than the release ones, otherwise they should not
On Fri, January 27, 2012 14:10, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Op 27 januari 2012 14:00 heeft Marco van de Voort
> het volgende geschreven:
>> One can try to cut corners, but that will only end up having to install
>> the
>> release anyway at the first hickup.
>
> I'd expect the utils in fpcbuild/trunk
If a class has a public reader property like this:
TLexemeList= class(TObject)
protected
fValue: TPrimaevalValue;
public
property Value: TPrimaevalValue read fValue;
...
is there a way of allowing a class helper to augment this with a
protecte
On 27.01.2012 22:46, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If a class has a public reader property like this:
TLexemeList= class(TObject)
protected
fValue: TPrimaevalValue;
public
property Value: TPrimaevalValue read fValue;
...
is there a way of allowing a class helper to augment this with a
protected writ
Sven Barth wrote:
On 27.01.2012 22:46, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If a class has a public reader property like this:
TLexemeList= class(TObject)
protected
fValue: TPrimaevalValue;
public
property Value: TPrimaevalValue read fValue;
...
Note that below is in a different unit.
is there a way of
21 matches
Mail list logo
