I have filed a bug about the fatal error.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20874
Should I also file a bug about the other problem (IF not working
properly with QWordBool) or is this intended or undefined behavior?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
Hi list,
after a long pause I'm trying to revive some code which I didn't touch
as long as early this year. At that time it compiled OK with trunk FPC
(I believe version 2.5.1). Now I'm trying to make that code work with
current stable (AFAICS that's 2.4.4). Everything went smooth until
compiler s
In our previous episode, Honza said:
> after a long pause I'm trying to revive some code which I didn't touch
> as long as early this year. At that time it compiled OK with trunk FPC
> (I believe version 2.5.1).
Early that year 2.5.1 was trunk yes. That same code is now the future fixes
branch for
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Bernd wrote:
2011/12/10 Michael Van Canneyt :
Check the FTP server, somewhere in the 2.6 directory.
Found it, Thanks.
The reason I was looking for it was I wanted to know whether there has
something changed with the optimization switches. But it seems this
document st
> Where did you find this in the docs ?
On the official ftp server:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/docs/
I downloadad doc-pdf.zip (file dats inside the zip of all contained
pdf files is 2011-10-9-18:01)
The file I am referring to is the prog.pdf (Programmer's guide):
Programmer’
I wrote:
>
> I think I found some documentation that still doesn't include
> CloseThread in the examples.. I will send patches or recommendations to
> the documentation soon. For example closethread is now documented as a
> function, but some of the other pages that show threading examples just
>
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Bernd wrote:
Where did you find this in the docs ?
On the official ftp server:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/docs/
I downloadad doc-pdf.zip (file dats inside the zip of all contained
pdf files is 2011-10-9-18:01)
The file I am referring to is the prog
2011/12/11 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, Honza said:
>> Now I'm trying to make that code work with
>> current stable (AFAICS that's 2.4.4)
>
> Correct, but it is relatively short before the 2.6.0 release, with a first
> RC1 already available. Since 2.6.0 might arrive this year sti
Hello listers,
I want to sort an open unidimensional array of integers from the minimum
to the maximum and from the maximum to the minimum.
Is there a standard unit providing this kind of service? Regarding the
number of elements is not very high, I don't need complex algorithms.
Thank you
On 12/11/2011 09:10 PM, Luciano de Souza wrote:
> Hello listers,
>
> I want to sort an open unidimensional array of integers from the minimum
> to the maximum and from the maximum to the minimum.
>
MSEgui has sorting functions for dynamic arrays in
lib/common/kernel/msearrayutils.pas.
http://git
Yes, the unit seems to be very complete. I will study it and I am sure
good results will come up!
Thank you!
Em 11/12/2011 18:18, Martin Schreiber escreveu:
On 12/11/2011 09:10 PM, Luciano de Souza wrote:
Hello listers,
I want to sort an open unidimensional array of integers from the minimum
Hi.
I'm trying to create a shared library (under linux) and I not sure what the
difference between the modifier *export* and the section *exports* is?
Or perhaps
when to use one and the other...
I have read both the programmers guide (7.2) and reference guide
(11.9.3) but this
didn't really
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to create a shared library (under linux) and I not sure what
> the
> difference between the modifier *export* and the section *exports* is?
> Or perhaps
> when to use one and the other...
Just different ways of doing it.
You can export each one, or you can use exports clause
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 23:35, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to create a shared library (under linux) and I not sure what the
> difference between the modifier *export* and the section *exports* is? Or
> perhaps
> when to use one and the other...
>
export means that you
On 2011-12-11 22:57, ik wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 23:35, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
mailto:t...@epidata.dk>> wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to create a shared library (under linux) and I not sure
what the
difference between the modifier *export* and the section *exports*
is? Or
On 11 Dec 2011, at 23:18, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> So in the following example "foo" would not be visible (neither as "foo" nor
> "bar") to other program (eg. a C-program) unless I added an *exports* section?
Correct. See also
http://bugs.freepascal.org/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bu
On 2011-12-11 23:30, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 11 Dec 2011, at 23:18, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
So in the following example "foo" would not be visible (neither as "foo" nor
"bar") to other program (eg. a C-program) unless I added an *exports* section?
Correct. See also
http://bugs.freepa
> Ok, thanks for clearifying that. I guess it's going to be a lot of
> include files instead... :)
>
> -Torsten.
Why do you need include files in your case?
You can put the units in the uses clause of your library.
library something;
uses
someunit;
exports
someunit.yourproc;
end.
The so
On 12 Dec 2011, at 00:48, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> In newer versions of FPC it allows you to put an exports clause in the
> unit itself, but older versions didn't allow it.
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=4398&history=1
That functionality is buggy and cannot be used saf
On 2011-12-12 00:48, nore...@z505.com wrote:
Ok, thanks for clearifying that. I guess it's going to be a lot of
include files instead... :)
-Torsten.
Why do you need include files in your case?
You can put the units in the uses clause of your library.
Because it is still going to give me a
20 matches
Mail list logo
