On 06/10/2011 20:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> rem check setting - yes, input:
> git config --global core.autocrlf
> input
The Git installation under Windows set mine to true (not input).
> So while it could be used, I'd have to remember to run unix2dos over it
> - that is, if people expect a
On 7-10-2011 9:15, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 20:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> The Git installation under Windows set mine to true (not input).
true it is, see other message ;)
>> So while it could be used, I'd have to remember to run unix2dos over it
>> - that is, if people expect
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > So while it could be used, I'd have to remember to run unix2dos over it
> > - that is, if people expect a Windows patch (
>
> I don't think that is needed. I believe the 'patch' program will sort
> that out by itself. I have sent numerous patche
On 7-10-2011 9:15, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I don't think that is needed. I believe the 'patch' program will sort
> that out by itself. I have sent numerous patches to FPC and Lazarus
> (both those repositories are git ones on my Linux system). Nobody has
> ever complained that the EOL style was
On 07/10/2011 11:28, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> Even up to date patch doesn't always process lineendings properly btw. I
> have to dos2unix often on *nix too.
Interesting. I would think sharing code between platform with patches is
a bog-standard task these days, and all tools in question shou
On 07/10/2011 12:52, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> doesn't work - will need patch -p1 < git.diff
Correct, and anybody that has applied a handful of patches or more in
there time would have known that already. ;-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free
On 7-10-2011 15:13, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 12:52, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> doesn't work - will need patch -p1 < git.diff
>
> Correct, and anybody that has applied a handful of patches or more in
> there time would have known that already. ;-)
Sure, but why add to the aggravat
On 07/10/2011 15:53, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> Sure, but why add to the aggravation - SVN diff doesn't do this, so one
> less difference to worry about:
It's still in the universal patch format, with or without the path
prefixes. Also nobody should commit a patch blindly. They should review
the
On 07/10/2011 14:53, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 7-10-2011 15:13, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>> On 07/10/2011 12:52, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>> doesn't work - will need patch -p1 < git.diff
>>
>> Correct, and anybody that has applied a handful of patches or more in
>> there time would have know
On 7-10-2011 11:28, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> I usually apply patches on FreeBSD, and in rarer cases Linux.
>
> Even up to date patch doesn't always process lineendings properly btw. I
> have to dos2unix often on *nix too.
>
> Recently a lot of patches with incorrect filenames, or no filenames
On 7-10-2011 16:08, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 15:53, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Sure, but why add to the aggravation - SVN diff doesn't do this, so one
>> less difference to worry about:
>
> It's still in the universal patch format, with or without the path
> prefixes. Also nobody
Am 07.10.2011 11:28, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>>> So while it could be used, I'd have to remember to run unix2dos over it
>>> - that is, if people expect a Windows patch (
>>
>> I don't think that is needed. I believe the 'patch' program will so
Am 07.10.2011 16:08, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 07/10/2011 15:53, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Sure, but why add to the aggravation - SVN diff doesn't do this, so one
>> less difference to worry about:
>
> It's still in the universal patch format, with or without the path
> prefixes. Also nob
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > Even up to date patch doesn't always process lineendings properly btw. I
> > have to dos2unix often on *nix too.
>
> Interesting. I would think sharing code between platform with patches is
> a bog-standard task these days, and all tools in ques
On 07.10.2011 20:44, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 07.10.2011 11:28, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
So while it could be used, I'd have to remember to run unix2dos over it
- that is, if people expect a Windows patch (
I don't think that is needed. I b
15 matches
Mail list logo
