Re: [fpc-pascal] Cannot build RTL for native NT

2011-09-12 Thread Sven Barth
On 11.09.2011 16:28, Andre Tampubolon wrote: These were the steps I did (based onhttp://wiki.freepascal.org/Target_NativeNT) 1. Check outsvn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/trunk (revision 19048), put it into C:\Downloads\Software\fpc 2. Build ppc386 and fpc

[fpc-pascal] TypeInfo Illegal Expression

2011-09-12 Thread Leonardo M . Ramé
I'm converting a Delphi app to FPC and I'm getting an "Error: Illegal expression" when I use the function TypeInfo. Example: TypeInfo(TDateTime). The unit that calls this function is mode objfpc. I'm using FPC 2.7.1 from trunk on Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 11.04). Any hint? Thanks in advance,  Le

[fpc-pascal] Re: Cannot build RTL for native NT

2011-09-12 Thread anta40
Sure I can wait. It's not a high priority for me. You should finish your thesis first. -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Cannot-build-RTL-for-native-NT-tp4791606p4794845.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

[fpc-pascal] WinCE multithreading

2011-09-12 Thread Fabio Luis Girardi
Hi! I'm porting a multi-thread project to WinCE. Everything works fine, except when I put a Label (or any window control) on any form and link it with the data coming from any thread. My question is: What's the current state of the WinCE port with threads? -- The best regards, Fabio Luis Girard

Re: [fpc-pascal] WinCE multithreading

2011-09-12 Thread Zaher Dirkey
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fabio Luis Girardi wrote: > Hi! > > I'm porting a multi-thread project to WinCE. Everything works fine, > except when I put a Label (or any window control) on any form and link > it with the data coming from any thread. My question is: What's the > current state of

Re: [fpc-pascal] Overloading the increment operator (+=)

2011-09-12 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: > > > Flávio Etrusco schrieb: >> >> "+=" can't be efficiently implemented with two operations (since >> concatenating the operand would be unexpected to the user...). > > Why not use "inc(x,y)"? > ___