At Tuesday, 23.08.2011 on 8:57 Michael Fuchs wrote:
> Hello,
>
>WriteLn(FloatToStr(100 / 0));
>
> This code prints on the screen "+Inf", but I think it should be "NaN".
> Is this a bug or a special case in computer arithmetic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#In_computer_arithm
Am 23.08.2011 09:16, schrieb Andreas Schneider:
This code prints on the screen "+Inf", but I think it should be "NaN".
Is this a bug or a special case in computer arithmetic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#In_computer_arithmetic
Oh, thank you. I should not read only the german
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 22 Aug 2011, at 23:08, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> So, I understood right, is not supported.
>> I not need these utilities and I do not know if they all are important
>> or who uses them, etc.
>
> Some of them are used by the makefiles, some
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Den Jean wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2011 23:24:29 Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> 3. Install everything to the same prefix. Add CROSSINSTALL=1 to the "make
>> install" line for which you do not want to install the utilities (e.g., if
>> you want the default compiler to be
On 23 Aug 2011, at 08:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I just searched all my PDF docs for FPC, and couldn't find a single
> reference to 'crossinstall' anywhere. :-(
The FPC documentation does not document building FPC itself, that is what the
buildfaq is for (although apparently it doesn't ment
Hi,
For developers that use FPC sources from SVN, like me, I ask:
1. There are some advantage to use 'make install' to compile FPC? Which?
2. There are some advantage to install (make install) in a directory
different of the sources? Which?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
_
I followed the bug report
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
and it says that it is resolved and closed.
I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
An unhandled exception occurred at $0041099C :
EThread : Fai
Al 23/08/11 22:46, En/na rzbhatti ha escrit:
> I followed the bug report
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
> and it says that it is resolved and closed.
>
> I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
> 256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
>
>
On 08/23/11 22:46, rzbhatti wrote:
> I followed the bug report
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
> and it says that it is resolved and closed.
>
> I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
> 256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
Euhm ? You are
Thanks, this definitely helps at least the reason why it is breaking. I am
not sure how to get around it though.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Strange-issue-with-threads-tp2823464p4728549.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list arc
I am trying to write a multi-core processor simulator . I want 256 of them
run as simultaneous threads.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Strange-issue-with-threads-tp2823464p4728565.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at
11 matches
Mail list logo
