Am 24.09.2010 15:36, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>
> On 24 Sep 2010, at 14:35, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> On 24 Sep 2010, at 11:48, Adrian Veith wrote:
>>
>>> Register allocation is on a comparable level for both versions.
>>
>> Delphi keeps the "Bar" pointer in a register, while FPC spills it to
>> the st
With asm cse enabled as in 2.5, I think it should be also doable to use
ebp as general purpose register if the stack frame is omitted, this
should squeeze out another few percents.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.f
Am 26.09.2010 23:53, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
> With asm cse enabled as in 2.5,
Disabled I mean.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 26 Sep 2010, at 23:25, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 24.09.2010 15:36, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>>
>> Correction: Delphi keeps the hidden parent frame pointer parameter in a
>> register (which is required every time Bar is accessed), while FPC puts
>> it on the stack. The end result is the same tho
