I know that FPC works under ARM+Linux. Is this also true for the
Cortex version of ARM? One of our major applications is written in C++
simply because it is to run in the future on an embedded system as well
as the PC. Well the embedded processor has been chosen - the Luminary
(TI) ARM-Cortex
On 23 Aug 2010, at 16:09, Andreas Berger wrote:
I know that FPC works under ARM+Linux. Is this also true for the
Cortex version of ARM? One of our major applications is written in C+
+ simply because it is to run in the future on an embedded system as
well as the PC. Well the embedded proce
Den 23-08-2010 16:09, Andreas Berger skrev:
I know that FPC works under ARM+Linux. Is this also true for the
Cortex version of ARM? One of our major applications is written in C++
simply because it is to run in the future on an embedded system as
well as the PC. Well the embedded processor ha
Thanks Jonas and Jeppe for your answers. I will probably wait then to
switch (or try to convince the company to use an ARM-9)
On 23/8/2010 11:21 AM, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
Den 23-08-2010 16:09, Andreas Berger skrev:
I know that FPC works under ARM+Linux. Is this also true for the
Cortex ver
I did this kind of thing some time ago, but have forgotten the details.
Let us say you have something like TBaseType(Variable).Method, you want to
let TBaseType be a variable so you can have some code like this.
procedure (value:someType)
var
variableType: TClass; //not quite sure here
variab
Like so:
procedure Test;
var
SomeType: TClass;
SomeObject: TObject;
begin
SomeType := TStringList;
SomeObject := SomeType.Create;
(SomeObject as TStrings).Add('Hello World');
ShowMessage((SomeObject as TStrings)[0]);
SomeObject.Free;
end;
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Frank Churc
I see no -CX / -XX appeared in the command line.
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> So, I try removing smart target. It works! But the binaries aren't
>> smartlinked...
>
> What makes you think so?
> ___
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal
It can be implemented with RTTI or variants perhaps.
Anthony Walter-3 wrote:
>
> Like so:
>
> procedure Test;
> var
> SomeType: TClass;
> SomeObject: TObject;
> begin
> SomeType := TStringList;
> SomeObject := SomeType.Create;
> (SomeObject as TStrings).Add('Hello World');
> ShowMe
Anthony Walter-3 wrote:
>
> Like so:
>
> procedure Test;
> var
> SomeType: TClass;
> SomeObject: TObject;
> begin
> SomeType := TStringList;
> SomeObject := SomeType.Create;
> (SomeObject as TStrings).Add('Hello World');
> ShowMessage((SomeObject as TStrings)[0]);
> SomeObject.Fr
No, if all your types are classes descending from the same root you
can do it is like this:
type
TBaseType = class;
procedure somemethod();
end;
TExtendedType = class(TBaseType);
TBaseTypeClass = class of TBaseType;
procedure (value: TBaseType; type_: TBaseTypeClass)
begin
value :
On 21 Aug 2010, at 08:59, leledumbo wrote:
> I want to build a smartlinked (stripped and optimized as well) version of fpc
> for win64 from win32, so I call:
> make all smart STRIP=1 OPTIMIZE=1 OS_TARGET=win64 CPU_TARGET=x86_64
>
> but this ends in failing to call ppcx64. Hey, shouldn't it call
Oh, is that so? What about defining CREATE_SMART and LINK_SMART?
Jonas Maebe-2 wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Aug 2010, at 08:59, leledumbo wrote:
>
>> I want to build a smartlinked (stripped and optimized as well) version of
>> fpc
>> for win64 from win32, so I call:
>> make all smart STRIP=1 OPTIMIZE=1
In our previous episode, Frank Church said:
> I did this kind of thing some time ago, but have forgotten the details.
>
> Let us say you have something like TBaseType(Variable).Method, you want to
> let TBaseType be a variable so you can have some code like this.
>
> procedure (value:someType)
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
