Hi,
As I stated in another thread, namespaces are not perfect, but they do
work, and they do greatly reduce the chances for unitname or classname
conflicts. Other languages and frameworks (Java, .NET, C++ etc)
already showed this.
How visible is the unit name conflict problem? Just think, how ma
On 25 July 2010 19:16, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> What unit name conflicts ? In 15 years that I work with Delphi and FPC, and
> I have use many many packages, I encountered exactly 1 conflict:
Then you are extremely lucky. I have experience stacks of unit name
conflicts in my years of programm
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 25 July 2010 19:16, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What unit name conflicts ? In 15 years that I work with Delphi and FPC, and
I have use many many packages, I encountered exactly 1 conflict:
Then you are extremely lucky. I have experience stack
On 25 July 2010 23:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The discussion is not about namespaces. Object Pascal HAS namespaces,
> namely units. The discussion is about 'enhancing' the namespace to allow one
> or more dots in the name.
With the importance that the '.' is only needed when resolving a
co
