Hi all,
Still working on my locate clone at
http://bitbucket.org/jb/flocate/
- download at
http://bitbucket.org/jb/flocate/downloads
Running Free Pascal Compiler version 2.4.1 [2010/06/01] for x86_64 on
Windows.
I've cobbled together some Firebird database code.
If you want to have a more comple
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
Hi all,
Still working on my locate clone at
http://bitbucket.org/jb/flocate/
- download at
http://bitbucket.org/jb/flocate/downloads
Running Free Pascal Compiler version 2.4.1 [2010/06/01] for x86_64 on
Windows.
I've cobbled together some Firebird database cod
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>> Finally, the question:
>> What I really want is to get a Firebird SQLCODE error code or some other
>> details that allow me to figure out whether one of my custom exceptions
>> get called. Also, it seems something is
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>> Finally, the question:
>> What I really want is to get a Firebird SQLCODE error code or some other
>> details that allow me to figure out whether one of my custom exceptions
>> get called. Also, it seems something is
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
Finally, the question:
What I really want is to get a Firebird SQLCODE error code or some other
details that allow me to figure out whether one of my custom exceptions
get called. Al
On 5 June 2010 00:47, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
> It may be better building the whole compiler for the latest version of
> cygwin, but I'll see if I can scrape together the necessary files you
> can drop into your fpc bin directory for this to work (not that many).
> I managed to get a simple writel
I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed a
long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
should be used. I need an advice about which unit should be used in terms of
features, speed, etc.
Also, if someone here know a better approac
Hello,
I have renamed a unit previously called "UnitType" to "UnitSystem". The unit
name itself, its file name, and the name used to import it in a uses clause
inside a testing program where all changed.
But the linker still expects the previous name:
testUnit.pas(78,1) Warning: Object UnitType.
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed a
> long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
> should be used. I need an advice about which unit should be used in terms of
On 05 Jun 2010, at 19:38, spir wrote:
> I have renamed a unit previously called "UnitType" to "UnitSystem". The unit
> name itself, its file name, and the name used to import it in a uses clause
> inside a testing program where all changed.
> But the linker still expects the previous name:
> te
Hi
The pcre library (written in C) has a good reputation. You can get pascal
headers from the Project JEDI Code Library (JCL).
Mischi___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Try deleting testunit.o and/or testunit.a, testunit.ppu
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:13:31 -0700
David Emerson wrote:
> Try deleting testunit.o and/or testunit.a, testunit.ppu
Yes, there was another unit still referencing "UnitType" -- but not used by the
TestUnit test prog. Strange that it may prevent testUnit to compile and link.
Anything, deleted all bu
Schindler Karl-Michael wrote on June 6, 2010 1:09:02 AM:
>The pcre library (written in C) has a good reputation. You can get
pascal headers from the Project JEDI Code Library (JCL).
Wow, that seems a more promising approach in the current time, I'll look on it.
Thanks so much.
BTW, which approa
14 matches
Mail list logo
