Re: [fpc-pascal] RTL incomplete builds

On 01 Jun 2009, at 16:08, Richard Jasmin wrote: Is there anyone that has gotten around the string/ansi char and getmem build phase? What do you mean by "build phase"? I seem to be stuck in a recursion loop with the getmem/sysgetmem routines and the ansi/string char issue patch doesn't help,

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:03:08 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >[...] > > Thanks. > > Maybe this can be used for debug/release. > > I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets. > > Why not ? you can use > subtarget=gtk2-debug How can I pass sub targets to fppkg? > > My dream is

[fpc-pascal] thiscall

hello! does FPC supports thiscall convention, at least for windows COM Interfaces? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions#thiscall Yes, i know, microsoft states that COM intefaces should use safecall convention. But there's at least 2 interfaces, i know, that're using thiscall, inst

Re: [fpc-pascal] thiscall

On 05 Jun 2009, at 21:38, dmitry boyarintsev wrote: does FPC supports thiscall convention No, it doesn't. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal