Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

2009-06-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt : > > I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard. > Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'. Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a standard. The "dot" files idea is a mess, the FHS is a mess. I greatly

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

2009-06-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: 2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt : I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard. Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'. Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a standard. The "dot" file

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

2009-06-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt : > > Why ? Windows is even more of a mess as far as I'm concerned, The only nice thing is you can query the system for some basic applications: eg: I need to open a text file, I know notepad.exe will exist. etc... At least now with the xdg-open command and it's vario

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

2009-06-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: 2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt : lot more consistent in it's config locations across various KDE based applications. And KDE is also a lot more consistent in it's UI across various KDE based applications. Issues I frequently see in Gnome: * I e

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmake: output directories

2009-06-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt : > > Use Kubuntu ? I do, now. I did for Kubuntu 9.04, and then had to revert back to 8.04 LTS because 9.04 had to many graphics issues (X11 drawing bugs which I reported and affected fpGUI, MSEgui and WINE). But damn, Kubuntu 9.04 did look beautiful. > > ls -lad .* >