In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> > > The documentation is there, the example not (yet).
> >
> > Huh? I commit one last week (or the week before that?!)
>
> What's the name?
packages/fcl-base/examples/avltreetest.pp
It was a bit of leftover from the testing I did before using it
I found some data structure related units in LCL (AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray,
DynHashArray, DynQueue, etc.). To be consistent (LCL: visual components,
FCL: non-visual), wouldn't it be better to move them to FCL?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Should-data-structures-part-in-
In our previous episode, leledumbo said:
> I found some data structure related units in LCL (AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray,
> DynHashArray, DynQueue, etc.). To be consistent (LCL: visual components,
> FCL: non-visual), wouldn't it be better to move them to FCL?
What is there that is not already in FPC
AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray,
> DynHashArray, DynQueue
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> What is there that is not already in FPC ? Are these not simply leftovers
> of
> older times when Lazarus still had to compile with 1.0.x?
>
Oh, I didn't know about it. The first time I use Lazarus FPC was already
Just remember a Nimrod (and D) language feature called "compile time
expression evaluator", what do you think of incorporating it to FPC?
Link:
http://nimrod.ethexor.com/manual.html#constants
http://nimrod.ethexor.com/manual.html#constants
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com