Re: [fpc-pascal] FCL documentation AVL_tree

2009-03-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said: > > > The documentation is there, the example not (yet). > > > > Huh? I commit one last week (or the week before that?!) > > What's the name? packages/fcl-base/examples/avltreetest.pp It was a bit of leftover from the testing I did before using it

[fpc-pascal] Should data structures part in LCL be moved to FCL?

2009-03-10 Thread leledumbo
I found some data structure related units in LCL (AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray, DynHashArray, DynQueue, etc.). To be consistent (LCL: visual components, FCL: non-visual), wouldn't it be better to move them to FCL? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Should-data-structures-part-in-

Re: [fpc-pascal] Should data structures part in LCL be moved to FCL?

2009-03-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, leledumbo said: > I found some data structure related units in LCL (AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray, > DynHashArray, DynQueue, etc.). To be consistent (LCL: visual components, > FCL: non-visual), wouldn't it be better to move them to FCL? What is there that is not already in FPC

Re: [fpc-pascal] Should data structures part in LCL be moved to FCL?

2009-03-10 Thread leledumbo
AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray, > DynHashArray, DynQueue Marco van de Voort wrote: > > What is there that is not already in FPC ? Are these not simply leftovers > of > older times when Lazarus still had to compile with 1.0.x? > Oh, I didn't know about it. The first time I use Lazarus FPC was already

[fpc-pascal] Compile time expression evaluator

2009-03-10 Thread leledumbo
Just remember a Nimrod (and D) language feature called "compile time expression evaluator", what do you think of incorporating it to FPC? Link: http://nimrod.ethexor.com/manual.html#constants http://nimrod.ethexor.com/manual.html#constants -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com