On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Any recommendations on which library to use to create web enabled FPC apps?
We have 4 applications in our company based on FPC + Powtils to
generate standard CGI apps and so far it's working very well. Powtils
also has some nice features li
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Andreas Berger
wrote:
> I'm interested to know why no one mentioned powtils yet (other than the
> original poster).
I might be a bit late, but I just gave some comments on Powtils. :-)
> I also am looking into writing a fairly complex CGI
> program and powtils see
Op maandag 02-03-2009 om 16:20 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Francisco
Reyes:
> Marco van de Voort writes:
>
> > Sorry, old name, nowadays it is fcl-web. See packages/
>
> Don't see it at
> http://www.freepascal.org/packages
>
> Is there where I should look?
It's part of the fcl, in Lazarus you
Since the discussion in this thread has advanced pretty far along toward
recommending a FP and Powtils solution to you, then it appears you have a
technical answer from the group you can explore.
However, without suggesting there is a bias in favor of a specific
client-centric vs server-centric we
One further point in this thread ... As a starting point in your thinking
thru the design choices, here is a fairly complete but accessible article on
the topic you might find helpful
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/wa-ajaxarch/index.html
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Prince R
Hello!
I´m just trying to use free Pascal for the first time.
When I Try to compile a test program, I get the compiler message:
Error: Illegal parameter: -Opentium3
or:
Fatal: Unable to open file C:\FPC\2.2.2\bin\i386-win32\fp.cfg
Fatal: Compilation aborted.
Can you help me?
Thanks
Jens
I thi
On 03 Mar 2009, at 20:02, Jens Kluschat wrote:
I´m just trying to use free Pascal for the first time.
When I Try to compile a test program, I get the compiler message:
Error: Illegal parameter: -Opentium3
or:
Fatal: Unable to open file C:\FPC\2.2.2\bin\i386-win32\fp.cfg
Fatal: Compilation ab
Op dinsdag 03-03-2009 om 12:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Prince
Riley:
> Primarily the reason why is -- especially for DB web applications --
> is efficiency, maintainability, and scalability. The recent major
> efforts by Mozilla, Google, and others to improve the performance of
> browser Jav
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> If users use the application constantly, don't use a web-application.
>
> So the things explained in this document from IBM is usefull for very
> large systems which a lot of users (Like Amazon, but they also don't
> like the idea of a
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Andrew Brunner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > If users use the application constantly, don't use a web-application.
> >
> > So the things explained in this document from IBM is usefull for very
> > large systems which a lot of use
Hi,
I want to convert a string to a TDateTime variable.
In example the string is: 'November 21 09:42:21 2008'.
I tried ScanDateTime with ' dd hh:nn:ss ' pattern but not
working. How can I convert this type of string to DateTime?
Gabor
___
f
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> To prove my point I once did performance tests with AJAX, SOAP and whatnot
> technologies when compared to a specialized C/S protocol. In general the
> conclusion was that SOAP and standards-based applications worked 6 times
> slower. A
Joost
Reading the responses on this discussion thread, it appears the 'religious
war' you mentioned in your prior post was unavoidable.
Not to add any fuel to the warring opinions I'd like answer a comment you
made in response to my response.
The recent push to make web applications (not simply
But what irie pascal offers is the ability to compile my code once,
then execute it on any of the supported platforms.
Fpc can't do that.
It's really a matter of preference, I know, but it's kind of a moot
point, since Stewart King has clearly stated there is no intent to
support osx, and si
Gabor Boros wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to convert a string to a TDateTime variable.
> In example the string is: 'November 21 09:42:21 2008'.
> I tried ScanDateTime with ' dd hh:nn:ss ' pattern but not
> working. How can I convert this type of string to DateTime?
>
ScanDateTime does the
I used to be on your side a few years ago, Joost. But now I can fully
understand why many people start to migrating to web based
applications. Especially when your application is used round across
the globe or across the nation.
> But the key point in this is that people forget that javascript-pro
> I've heard all this before since 10 years, and it is only true for small
> applets used by a broad public.
10 years ago, people was just talking about it. Today, they're doing
it. C'mon, look around, there are thousands of complex applications
provided on the web. Not to mention, web-based appli
> Again, not a major issue, since testing needs done on all the given
> platforms anyhow, but I just liked the write once, run anywhere approach.
If you really need that, despite you said it's not a major issue, then
you should consider other solutions. FPC is simply not for the
purpose. FPC is ab
Bee wrote:
I've heard all this before since 10 years, and it is only true for small
applets used by a broad public.
10 years ago, people was just talking about it. Today, they're doing
it. C'mon, look around, there are thousands of complex applications
provided on the web. No
> Yes, and they are nearly all slow, cumbersome and unresponsive. They are
> typical of companies that say "this is easier for me. I don't care whether
> you like using it or not, you are going to have to use it if you want to
> deal with us, and anyway everyone else has web apps that are just as b
And? I don't understand your suggestion.
leledumbo írta:
Gabor Boros wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert a string to a TDateTime variable.
In example the string is: 'November 21 09:42:21 2008'.
I tried ScanDateTime with ' dd hh:nn:ss ' pattern but not
working. How can I convert this type of
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Prince Riley wrote:
> Joost
>
> Reading the responses on this discussion thread, it appears the 'religious
> war' you mentioned in your prior post was unavoidable.
>
> Not to add any fuel to the warring opinions I'd like answer a comment you
> made in response to my respon
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Bee wrote:
> > Yes, and they are nearly all slow, cumbersome and unresponsive. They are
> > typical of companies that say "this is easier for me. I don't care whether
> > you like using it or not, you are going to have to use it if you want to
> > deal with us, and anyway eve
23 matches
Mail list logo
