On 06 Jul 2007, at 12:37, Luca Olivetti wrote:
FPC can do both, but syscalls are default because these binaries
are more
portable across distributions (and versions) than glibc and thus
easier to
deploy. (and recently, libc has been broken after the introduction
of the
new syscalls. There
En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 06 Jul 2007, at 12:37, Luca Olivetti wrote:
FPC can do both, but syscalls are default because these binaries are
more
portable across distributions (and versions) than glibc and thus
easier to
deploy. (and recently, libc has been broken after the introduction o
On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote:
I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with
linux/arm.
And without using libc, what kind of syscalls do fpc generate OABI
or EABI? (or, again, is there no difference between the two?)
I have no idea. You could try comp
En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote:
I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with
linux/arm.
And without using libc, what kind of syscalls do fpc generate OABI or
EABI? (or, again, is there no difference between the two?)
I have
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2007, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Luca Olivetti:
> En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
> >
> > On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> >
> >>> I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with
> >>> linux/arm.
> >>
> >> And without using libc, what kind of syscal
En/na Marc Santhoff ha escrit:
Can't you try to write a simple program using the functions in question
and compile with "fpc -al"?
the syscalls are in the rtl, so they won't show up in my program (not
that I understand asm assambler, but according to
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2005-
