Hello,
with latest Trunk, Rev. 7387, building of the ARM-Linux RTL fails:
ppcrossarm.exe -Tlinux -Parm -XParm-linux- -Xc -Xr -Fi../inc -Fi../arm
-Fi../unix -Fiarm -FE. -FU../../rtl/units/arm-linux -Tlinux -CX -darm
-Us -Sg system.pp
softfpu.pp(122,12) Error: Duplicate identifier "UInt64"
syst
Hello again,
with latest Trunk, Rev. 7387, building of the ARM-Linux RTL fails:
ppcrossarm.exe -Tlinux -Parm -XParm-linux- -Xc -Xr -Fi../inc -Fi../arm
-Fi../unix -Fiarm -FE. -FU../../rtl/units/arm-linux -Tlinux -CX -darm
-Us -Sg system.pp
softfpu.pp(122,12) Error: Duplicate identifier "UInt6
"The Motorola MPx220 runs a 200-MHz Texas Instruments OMAP 1611 processor",
which is a a 32bit "ARM v5" with a " ARM926EJ-S" core.
It runs Windows 2003 Smartphone though, so I'm guessing the answer is a little
more tricky - probably no.
M
- Original Message -
From: Pianoman
To:
Hi
I am a new user of FPC can somebody guide me how to access directly hardware
ports
with FPC
Thanks
Ezra
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam
and email virus protection.
_
On 5/17/07, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It runs Windows 2003 Smartphone though, so I'm guessing the answer is a
little more tricky - probably no.
Why no?
Windows 2003 Smartphone is still Windows CE. Microsoft just like to
give several wierd names for the different versions of Windows
Op Fri, 18 May 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
> The port array will fail on NT versions of windows. Better to use the
> methods described here:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Hardware_Access
Can you please implement a ports unit for Windows then? The last thing we
need is
The port array will fail on NT versions of windows. Better to use the
methods described here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Hardware_Access
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
Op Thu, 17 May 2007, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi
> I am a new user of FPC can somebody guide me how to access directly hardware
> ports
> with FPC
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#accessioports
Daniël___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
> Why no?
Because Windows CE <> Win32. Smartphone more so. However, the word
"probably" conveyed my doubt that I had all the facts. There you go.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fp
Hello Matt, thanks for your fast input.
Matt Emson wrote:
Any idea how I know if a class, in a class pointer, overrides a virtual
method? Eg:
vfooclass := tboo1;
// vfooclass doesn't implement sample.
vfooclass := tboo2;
// vfooclass implements sample.
You need to implement a virtual m
> Any idea how I know if a class, in a class pointer, overrides a virtual
> method? Eg:
> vfooclass := tboo1;
> // vfooclass doesn't implement sample.
>
> vfooclass := tboo2;
> // vfooclass implements sample.
You need to implement a virtual method, even if it does nothing. Are you
sure you're
Hello,
Any idea how I know if a class, in a class pointer, overrides a virtual
method? Eg:
tfooclass = class of tfoo;
tfoo = class
procedure sample; virtual;
end;
tboo1 = class(tfoo)
end;
tboo2 = class(tfoo)
procedure sample; override;
end;
...
vfooclass := tboo1;
// vfooclass doesn'
> So, at this moment I know that I can:
>
> 1. Use a safe, magic and efficient way, but I need to know if it exists;
> 2. Create a "light" instance using vfooclass.NewInstance method;
> 3. hack the vmt.
>
> Which approach do you use?
I have worked with a bespoke OPF a few years ago. The way we got
13 matches
Mail list logo
