Re: [fpc-pascal] generated assembler

Florian Klaempfl schreef: Line 17 generates two assembler instructions. Line 22 generates three assembler instructions. As far as I can see both high(d) and @d[high(d)] are constants, because d is a global variable. Is it possible that line 22 will generate 2 assembler instructions in the futu

RE: [fpc-pascal] Win32 Build Errors

Lee, John wrote: > Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? Eg > couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few > lines or is it more complicated than this? 1) Do you get this error too when building Win32 snapshots? 2) It certainly doesn't mea

RE: [fpc-pascal] Win32 Build Errors

> Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? Eg > couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few > lines or is it more complicated than this? This situation is there already for years. ___ fpc-pascal ma

Re: [fpc-pascal] generated assembler

Vincent Snijders wrote: > Florian Klaempfl schreef: >>> >>> >>> Line 17 generates two assembler instructions. Line 22 generates three >>> assembler instructions. As far as I can see both high(d) and @d[high(d)] >>> are constants, because d is a global variable. >>> >>> Is it possible that line 22 w

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] Win32 Build Errors

> > Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? Eg > > couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few > > lines or is it more complicated than this? > This situation is there already for years. If I get it right, one is supposed to have CYGWIN for

RE: [fpc-pascal] Win32 Build Errors

Technically, this should not happen on ANY version of Windows. But, I digress. I'll just sit here building my Sparc Linux builds and making them available for download from my site :) Robert Wolfe ([EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Computer Programmer/Analyst & Web Programmer SRDAR, Roswel

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] Win32 Build Errors

>> > Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? >> Eg >> > couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few >> > lines or is it more complicated than this? >> This situation is there already for years. > > If I get it right, one is supposed to have C

Re: [fpc-pascal] Sparc Build

Wolfe, Robert wrote: > Greetings all! When building the Sparc Linux port of 2.1.1 from the > current (as of this email) SVN code, I get the following messages: Works here. > > /home/robert/fpc/compiler/ppc1 -Ur -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../sparc > -Fi../un