On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Giovanni Premuda wrote:
> Tom Verhoeff ha scritto:
> >This makes it much less attractive to release units without source
> >code. That may be understandable from an open-source perspective,
> >but in teaching I find it useful or even necessary to provide u
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Giovanni Premuda wrote:
> > Btw. no sane commercial Delphi developer has ever considered using a
> > component without source code at least since Delphi 2.0. Look at the
> > offering of component vendors and you will see that they invariably
> > offe
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Giovanni Premuda wrote:
Btw. no sane commercial Delphi developer has ever considered using a
component without source code at least since Delphi 2.0. Look at the
offering of component vendors and you wi
Hello list,
when a real number overflows the program halts with EInvalidOp error.
How can I make the program behave the more standard way, where the
variable gets the value "inf" and execution continues normally? This is
vital for many tasks, like fractal computation.
example program:
$ cat
Dimitris,
> when a real number overflows the program halts with EInvalidOp error.
> How can I make the program behave the more standard way, where the
> variable gets the value "inf" and execution continues normally? This is
> vital for many tasks, like fractal computation.
You can use try..excep
> No. 2.0.2 is a release and it sources won't change. If the fix proves
> it's stability in 2.1.1, it will be merged back to 2.0.3 which will be
> the base for the next release: 2.0.4.
Yes, that would be necessary. A fix for 4922 is essencial.
> We used the GNU linker on win32 for years and it wo
