Hallo list.
I'm having trouble with library/DLL under Win32 (exporting one function
and having a little GUI).
Compiles fine, but the host application can't load them. The Host is
closed source (think MSVC).
Same code compiles and runs fine with Delphi.
Can someone describe the main differences w
On 29 Dec 2005, at 04:27, L505 wrote:
Seems FPC always has graphics related issues for some reason when
compiling Delphi
code - I've not had problems with FPC/Delphi compatability when
working with text,
since I mainly work with text programs and not graphics.
There's no inherent differen
I decided to improve an old program, I had written for windows, using
FreePascal 1.0.10.
Having downloaded FPC 2.0.2, I wanted to use this version, believing
that the newer is the better.
So I tried to recompile my old source code with 2.0.2, getting a lot of
compile errors.
Anyhow, all of them
I can't find license for FreePascal documentation. Where I can get it?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> Same code compiles and runs fine with Delphi.
May be a troubles with export names. It is needed to define export
names explicite in "exports" clause.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listin
Aleksey Ulasevich wrote:
> I can't find license for FreePascal documentation. Where I can get it?
See sources of the docs e.g.
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcdocs/trunk/user.tex
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
you are using FP or its IDE and _not_ lazarus ... right ?
i had some troubles with building a DLL with lazarus, where identical
code would build link under lazarus, and my windows application
wouldn't load it, and everything would work fine when i built it using
the FP compiler standalone.
likely
Thanks for your reply.
Whats the difference, when compiling without Lazarus?
The library relys on the LCL (for GUI) and compiling from commandline
results in exactly the same (non working) dll.
Where can I learn more about the structures, calling conventions, etc
used by freepascal/Lazarus vs. Del
On 12/29/05, chromdildo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Whats the difference, when compiling without Lazarus?
i don't know.
i just wanted to mention it, in case it was relevant.
i had started doing development using the FP console IDE.
i then "discovered" Lazarus, and wa
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Maebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Quake 2 for Freepascal
>
> On 29 Dec 2005, at 04:27, L505 wrote:
>
> > Seems FPC always has graphics related issues for som
On 12/29/05, L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone is interested I can post the Quake 2 freepascal port up online.
i'm interested in looking at the code from an academic perspective.
please do post.
i could even help mirror it if need be.
Tony
_
>i had started doing development using the FP console IDE.
>
>i then "discovered" Lazarus, and wanting to be able to use a GUI IDE,
>
>i downloaded and installed it.
>
>i then took the exact same code, compiled it, which produced a DLL for
>me, and when i tried to get my hosting application to l
> If anyone is interested I can post the Quake 2 freepascal port up online.
>> i'm interested in looking at the code from an academic perspective.
>>
>> please do post.
>>
>> i could even help mirror it if need be.
http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Quake2FreePascal
Remember everyone,
13 matches
Mail list logo
