hi,
Is here someone that knows if there is a way to take control of
Opeoffice with FPC?
Time ago I made something with Delphi and OpenOffice COM Bridge, it was
an interesting and stimulating experience, mainly because OOffice is
available on many platforms, but this is not true for Delphi and CO
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Tiziano - Mekar Srl - wrote:
hi,
Is here someone that knows if there is a way to take control of
Opeoffice with FPC?
Time ago I made something with Delphi and OpenOffice COM Bridge, it was
an interesting and stimulating experience, mainly because OOffice is
available on
On 12/14/05, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I once wrote an article about using OpenOffice 1.1 and Delphi.
> There were only 2 ways to control it: using Java or COM. COM is
> just a bridge to Java. Currently it seems that there are Java,
> C++, COM and Python bindings. None of the
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 12/14/05, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I once wrote an article about using OpenOffice 1.1 and Delphi.
There were only 2 ways to control it: using Java or COM. COM is
just a bridge to Java. Currently it seems that the
Hi,
two days ago i posted a comment about my experiences porting our
database server to fpc. yesterday i tried to figure out where the speed
differences between delphi and fpc come from. At the moment i stuck a
little bit, because the results i get don't make any sense at the moment
to me.
An
>(astonishing that ShortStrings are slower than AnsiStrings in this example
in delphi).
Not really. Delphi is silently upcasting your shortstrings to AnsiStrings in
the background. You would probably have to recompile the VCL to get around
this ;-)
Hope that helps,
M
_
>
>>(astonishing that ShortStrings are slower than AnsiStrings in this
>> example
> in delphi).
>
> Not really. Delphi is silently upcasting your shortstrings to AnsiStrings
> in
> the background. You would probably have to recompile the VCL to get around
> this ;-)
I've commited a few small fixe
--
This e-mail was scanned with a private,
non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate.
See http://www.antivir.de for details.
--
This e-mail was scanned with a private,
non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate.
See http://www.antivir.de for details.
Hi,
will there be x86_64 rpm´s available s
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Hi,
FPC 2.0.2 is finally available for various platforms. 2.0.2 is mainly a
bug fix release to 2.0.0 though also some little features were added.
Get FPC 2.0.2 from http://www.freepascal.org/download.html or read the
whatsnew.txt here: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/di
Adrian Veith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> two days ago i posted a comment about my experiences porting our
> database server to fpc. yesterday i tried to figure out where the speed
> differences between delphi and fpc come from. At the moment i stuck a
> little bit, because the results i get don't make any s
Marcus Roeckrath wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> will there be x86_64 rpm´s available sson as they are provided for fpc
> 2.0.0?
No.
The current FPC team decided to reduce the number of package types
because it costs us too much
11 matches
Mail list logo