Hi,
> Your best choice probably is GO32v2. However, as for any other
> target, you need RTL compiled for the given target, the appropriate
> binutils (as and ld) and the right configuration.
Was FPC compiler able to create real-mode programs in the past? It
would be very important for my use, a v
Date sent: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:01:30 -0200
From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject:Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling for DOS
Hi Felipe,
> > Your best cho
Felipe, I use Win ME to make go32v2, v2.0.3 and v2.1.1 so this should work ok.
I've also used win9se in the past.
I produce daily snapshots of these. See ftp.freepascal.org\ snapshots\v20 &
v21, so you can download these & try them out.
Regards John
> -Original Message-
> From: [
Hi,
> No, FPC was being created as a protected-mode compiler from the very
> beginning.
Is it very different to compile for protect-mode DOS and real-mode DOS?
Interesting that FPC was based on TP 7, but TP 7 only compiled for real-mode.
> Yes, you can, although especially interrupts might be s
On 11/12/05, Lee, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe, I use Win ME to make go32v2, v2.0.3 and v2.1.1 so this should work
> ok. I've also used win9se in the past.
thanks, I´ll try them.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc
I'm using ShellExecute in my application on numerous occasions. What is
considered to be an OS independent alternative here?? Or do I ifdef it for
each platform??
Darius Blaszijk
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.f
>
> I'm using ShellExecute in my application on numerous occasions. What is
> considered to be an OS independent alternative here?? Or do I ifdef it for
> each platform??
>
> Darius Blaszijk
I do ifdef for each platform.
With lazarus (and KDE, Linux) I do :
var s:longint;
.
.
.
s:=shell('
