I've just installed Xcode 2.1 and can no longer compile FPC using
2.0.0. For good measure, I re-installed FPC 2.0.0 and the Xcode
Integration Kit, including the Universal Interfaces. The latter acted
oddly with a crashing program which tried to open up a dialog box,
until I mounted the Univ
Lance Boyle wrote:
I've just installed Xcode 2.1 and can no longer compile FPC using
2.0.0. For good measure, I re-installed FPC 2.0.0 and the Xcode
Integration Kit, including the Universal Interfaces. The latter acted
oddly with a crashing program which tried to open up a dialog box,
unt
It's great that 2.0 is out! Unfortunately it seems to break some
code I used for Porter Stemming because the code sometimes reads data
from a pchar at negative indexes. Reportedly this works fine in
Delphi 5 and I don't seem to have trouble with Delphi 7 but it
generates RTEs using fpc 2.0. (If
Hi there,
For Lazarus I have made a tool called LazDoc that attempts to integrate a
documentation editing tool with the IDE. Depending on the position of the
cursor on the source editor, the appropriate documentation tag is searched
and then selected in the editor.
Anyway, while I was working on t
Hi there,
For Lazarus I have made a tool called LazDoc that attempts to integrate a
documentation editing tool with the IDE. Depending on the position of the
cursor on the source editor, the appropriate documentation tag is searched
and then selected in the editor.
Anyway, while I was working on t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi there,
>
> For Lazarus I have made a tool called LazDoc that attempts to integrate a
> documentation editing tool with the IDE. Depending on the position of the
> cursor on the source editor, the appropriate documentation tag is searched
> and then selected in the e
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> For Lazarus I have made a tool called LazDoc that attempts to integrate a
> documentation editing tool with the IDE. Depending on the position of the
> cursor on the source editor, the appropriate documentation tag is searched
> and t
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> I'd rather you keep these todo separate. It'll slow down parsing
> (which is already horribly slow)
Huh? Really?
A small reminder: FPDoc can support different backends, the XML storage
is just the only one currently implemented. We can talk about this
anytime...
Sebastian Günther wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
I'd rather you keep these todo separate. It'll slow down parsing
(which is already horribly slow)
Huh? Really?
A small reminder: FPDoc can support different backends, the XML storage
is just the only one currently implemented. We can tal
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
> >
> > I'd rather you keep these todo separate. It'll slow down parsing
> > (which is already horribly slow)
>
> Huh? Really?
I didn't mean the FPC implementation specifically, but XML in general
is slow to parse.
Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
>
> I would prefer to profile the xml reader and see if we can improve it.
Yes, but I don't see this mutually exclusive :)
- Sebastian
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mai
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> I didn't mean the FPC implementation specifically, but XML in general
> is slow to parse.
Yes
> I know, but this would require a major rewrite of FPDoc.
> The TDOMElement is deeply rooted in the structure.
> And you need the XML anyway for transforming the ps
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
> >
> > I didn't mean the FPC implementation specifically, but XML in general
> > is slow to parse.
>
> Yes
>
>
> > I know, but this would require a major rewrite of FPDoc.
> > The TDOMElement is deeply rooted in
> It's great that 2.0 is out! Unfortunately it seems to break some
> code I used for Porter Stemming because the code sometimes reads data
> from a pchar at negative indexes. Reportedly this works fine in
> Delphi 5 and I don't seem to have trouble with Delphi 7 but it
> generates RTEs using fpc
This is very interesting. I've always wondered if anyone did this on
purpose, and I've always wondered what the big deal is with just
adding array range checking to C. A company with tons of internal
software development, and whose existence is made miserable by buffer
under/over flows, cou
15 matches
Mail list logo
