On Sun, 15 May 2005, L505 wrote:
> Something I am unsure about here (maybe I will need to implement it):
>
> When using FindPart function, and utilizing wild cards, I cannot figure a way
> to calculate the length of the
> string found. Only the matching start position of the found string.
> An
Hello,
The FPC team is pleased to announce the availability of version 2.0.0 of the
Free Pascal Compiler. This is the new stable version of the compiler.
Versions numbered 1.0.X and 1.9.Y are now considered obsolete and will no
longer be maintained.
What is Free Pascal ?
=
F
On Sun, 15 May 2005 14:14:15 -0700
L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mattias Gaertner nc-gaertnma [EMAIL PROTECTED] netcologne.de
> >Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:56:09 +0100
>
> >> Another option is
> >> http://anso.virtualave.net/delphi_stuff.htm#TRegExpr
> >>
> >> But I doubt that 1.0.x will eat it. Ev
What do we OS X types need to know about the "Free Pascal for Xcode
Integration Kit," in relation to version 2.0.0 of FPC? If we have
installed version 1.1 of the Integration Kit previously (e.g., for FPC
1.9.8) are we OK to proceed with FPC 2.0.0?
Jerry
On May 16, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Michael Va
Congratulations, and many thanks.
Will it compile itself ?
Bob Martin
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following on 16/05/05
10:17:46:
>
> Hello,
>
> The FPC team is pleased to announce the availability of version 2.0.0 of the
> Free Pascal Compiler. This is the new stable v
On Mon, 16 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Congratulations, and many thanks.
>
> Will it compile itself ?
Yes.
Michael.
>
> Bob Martin
>
>
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following on 16/05/05
> 10:17:46:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The FPC team is pleased to announce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, and many thanks.
Will it compile itself ?
Yes, of course :)
Bob Martin
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following on 16/05/05
10:17:46:
Hello,
The FPC team is pleased to announce the availability of version 2.0.0 of the
Free Pascal Compile
Hello,
Congratulation !
do you plan a new version 2.x.0 for DOS (go32v2) or development of DOS
version is stopped ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
There is a v2.0.0 version of go32v2 and will, I hope, be v2.x versions too.
When things have settled after the v2.0 release, I'll be making these available
as daily snapshots on ftp.freepascal.org in .../snapshots. The v2.0 compiler
has the same functionality as the rest of fpc v2.0 & works ok,
Hi
I have been making test to new ppcarm releas (1.9.9) and I
have found a old problem with cprtO.o
Linking test_libc
/usr/local/lib/fpc/1.9.9/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o(.text+0x6
4): In function `_haltproc':
: undefined reference to `_f
On Mon, May 16, 2005 12:15, Lance Boyle said:
> What do we OS X types need to know about the "Free Pascal for Xcode
> Integration Kit," in relation to version 2.0.0 of FPC? If we have
> installed version 1.1 of the Integration Kit previously (e.g., for FPC
> 1.9.8) are we OK to proceed with FPC 2.0
| > Attn: Mattias..(or anyone else who knows about regexpr units)
| >
| > Do you know which unit this is that you talked about of above?
|
| I don't remember. In the last years I used several regexpr units with fpc.
| synregexpr works with perl style regular expressions.
|
|
| > I'm
| > looking fo
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The FPC team is pleased to announce the availability of
> version 2.0.0 of the Free Pascal Compiler.
A great big thank you everone who contributed. Great work.
What is planned for the future ?
I have a weird question, and I am finding it hard to
put into words, so please
With compiler version 1.96, one of my command line applications is 1MB (win32)
With the 1.0.6 compiler (using dev pascal) it is just 100KB. (win32)
On linux, 1.96 the application was about 300KB.
(not so worried about linux, since this is not consistent testing..comparing
two OS's)
What is the m
> With compiler version 1.96, one of my command line applications is 1MB
> (win32)
> With the 1.0.6 compiler (using dev pascal) it is just 100KB. (win32)
>
> On linux, 1.96 the application was about 300KB.
> (not so worried about linux, since this is not consistent
> testing..comparing two OS's)
>
Date sent: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:03:28 -0700
From: L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject:[fpc-pascal] Executable size compiler 1.96 vs 1.06
Send reply to: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> > With compiler version 1.96, one of my command line applications is 1MB
> > (win32)
> > With the 1.0.6 compiler (using dev pascal) it is just 100KB. (win32)
> Initialization of the classes and implicitly used sysutils unit uses more
> code. Also the use of resourcestrings increases the binary.
17 matches
Mail list logo
