Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice me to completely switch from De
At 15:38 23-10-2004, you wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice m
On 23 okt 2004, at 15:38, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
code, whether you use much Windows-specific function
Hello Jonas,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
>> The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
>> programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
JM> I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
JM> code, whether you us
On 23 okt 2004, at 22:06, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Thanks to Peter Vreman for Lazarus link. It looks like a helpful
thing. However I wonder about its Mac compatibility - not too much
Mac-related info is there it seems.
It cannot yet generate programs which use the native Mac OS X gui
(Aqua). It can g
