[fpc-pascal]fpc 1.9.0 beta - error 200306065

I get the above error code when compiling a specific unit with the new 1.9.0 beta under Win32. It doesn't occur under either 1.0.10 or 1.0.6, which are the other two versions I keep around to test things. It only occurs when *compiling* the unit. When *building* the unit, it compiles perfectly, bu

Re: [fpc-pascal]fpc 1.9.0 beta - error 200306065

> I get the above error code when compiling a specific unit with the new > 1.9.0 > beta under Win32. > > It doesn't occur under either 1.0.10 or 1.0.6, which are the other two > versions I keep around to test things. It only occurs when *compiling* the > unit. When *building* the unit, it compiles

[fpc-pascal]FP newbie

Hi, I'm a FP newbie but a long-time Delphi and Pascal developer. I'm curious about several things regarding the current state of FP as well as its future. Since I'm considering the use of FP in classroom for my students and also for commercial development, I hope some of you could help me clea

Re: [fpc-pascal]FP newbie

> I'm a FP newbie but a long-time Delphi and Pascal developer. I'm curious > about several things regarding the current state of FP as well as its > future. Since I'm considering the use of FP in classroom for my students > and also for commercial development, I hope some of you could help me >

Re: [fpc-pascal]FP newbie

Thanks for replying! >> #1. Is there a white paper on the features the FP compiler >> supports and the features it doesn't support when compared >> to the Delphi compiler? I know I can dig this info on the >> manuals but I was hoping to find a feature matrix indicating >> the major diferences

Re: [fpc-pascal]FP newbie

> Hi, > > I'm a FP newbie but a long-time Delphi and Pascal developer. I'm curious > about several things regarding the current state of FP as well as its > future. Since I'm considering the use of FP in classroom for my students > and also for commercial development, I hope some of you coul

Re: [fpc-pascal]FP newbie

Hi!, > > #D. Is there (planned) support for class templates? Do we really need templates ? IMO, templates and reference based objects dont go too well. > > #E. Is there (planned) support for wxWindows? I think this > is a terrific abstraction layer for GUI. The best is > that it is st