> Hello FPC-Pascal,
>
> Saturday, May 8, 2010, 4:42:46 PM, you wrote:
>
> VH> So, apart from a possibly more optimized implementation (like
> VH> not changing the allocated memory size on each single
> VH> insertion/deletion) how do you come up with the idea that adding
> VH> another layer would
> Saturday, May 8, 2010, 5:07:12 PM, you wrote:
>
> JM> And depending on the usage patterns and the size of the
> JM> elements stored in the array, it probably can be. That's all he
> JM> was saying, and only as a side remark in the context of the
> JM> discussion (which was meanly to steer away a
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Saturday, May 8, 2010, 4:42:46 PM, you wrote:
VH> So, apart from a possibly more optimized implementation (like
VH> not changing the allocated memory size on each single
VH> insertion/deletion) how do you come up with the idea that adding
VH> another layer would make it faster?
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Saturday, May 8, 2010, 5:07:12 PM, you wrote:
JM> And depending on the usage patterns and the size of the
JM> elements stored in the array, it probably can be. That's all he
JM> was saying, and only as a side remark in the context of the
JM> discussion (which was meanly to steer
