On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sat, February 20, 2010 01:15, JoshyFun wrote:
Hello Tomas,
Friday, February 19, 2010, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote:
TH> No, this can't work that way, otherwise output of any accented
TH> character in one of the Windows codepages would result in the same
On Sat, February 20, 2010 01:15, JoshyFun wrote:
> Hello Tomas,
>
> Friday, February 19, 2010, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote:
>
> TH> No, this can't work that way, otherwise output of any accented
> TH> character in one of the Windows codepages would result in the same
> TH> error.
>
> Tested the "wrong"
Hello Tomas,
Friday, February 19, 2010, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote:
TH> No, this can't work that way, otherwise output of any accented
TH> character in one of the Windows codepages would result in the same
TH> error.
Tested the "wrong" return of stdout:
code page UTF8 - 65001 en Windows
Length of s
Hello Tomas,
Friday, February 19, 2010, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote:
TH> No, this can't work that way, otherwise output of any accented
TH> character in one of the Windows codepages would result in the same
TH> error.
Well I do not know the writeln internals, but if writeln writes 7
bytes and windows
