Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, L505 wrote: > > > Very nice compact stringlist in there to use... > > > Standard Classes stringlist adds about 60K-70K to your exe/elf while > > > CompactUtils > > > PStrList only adds maybe 1-5KB. > > > > Please compare what is comparable: > > > > The Classes unit contains

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread L505
> > Very nice compact stringlist in there to use... > > Standard Classes stringlist adds about 60K-70K to your exe/elf while > > CompactUtils > > PStrList only adds maybe 1-5KB. > > Please compare what is comparable: > > The Classes unit contains more than just the TStringlist and TList. > > It co

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread L505
> > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: > > > > > I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really > > > important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. > > > > > > Speaking of bigger application

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, L505 wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: > > > > > I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really > > > important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I > > > have > > > read, it's currently comp

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread L505
> > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: > > > I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really > > important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have > > read, it's currently compilable by FPC. KOL GUI stuff is not cross platform. But I

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: > >> > >>> I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really > >>> important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I > >>> have read, it's currently com

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: > > > I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really > > important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I > > have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. > > > > Speaking of bigger applications, I don'

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, ??? wrote: I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking of bigger applications, I don't see much differen

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] another fpc RAD: MSEide

2006-04-19 Thread Пётр Косаревский
I do neither use Lazarus, nor MSEide, but if executable size is really important, there is something called KOL (I didn't use it either). As I have read, it's currently compilable by FPC. Speaking of bigger applications, I don't see much difference between 6 or 30 Mb executables...