Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 20 sep 2006, at 16:09, Пётр Косаревский wrote: Well, I think, that the part "It's not because you don't pay me ..., that you do not have influence on the project ..." means, that I don't have direct influence on the project No. It was simply your "but I don't have anything to say anyway

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] variant part of a record

2006-09-20 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 20 sep 2006, at 13:20, Пётр Косаревский wrote: I'm vague: for the first time I hoped that when you access the variant part, if the "case" variable was named, program checks it run-time. Hoping that it was implemented this way, I asked about control over the relative place in the memory