On 7 May 2012, at 13:26, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
>
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:59:58 +0200
> From: Koenraad Lelong
> Subject: Re: RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Reversing bit-order of byte
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Message-
On 04-05-12 14:53, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
On 04-05-12 14:31, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
...
Compared to the other variants (e.g. with the multiplies, except for the
table lookup) you already save a lot of cycles - although I guess they
would be sufficiently fast anyway, considering the typical uart
On 04-05-12 14:31, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
It might be good to compile with -Cparmv6 (or -Cparmv7, do not know what
type the processor you use is), this generates a "better" return
instruction ("bx lr") - and for the rbit instruction you need armv6
already.
Wouldn't it be possible to do
r
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:14 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> ...
> > function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe;
> > asm
> >.long 0xe6ff0f30 // rbit r0, r0
> >lsr r0, r0, #23
> > end;
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking a bit fu
On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
...
function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe;
asm
.long 0xe6ff0f30 // rbit r0, r0
lsr r0, r0, #23
end;
Hi,
I've been looking a bit further at this.
I disassembled the code and this is the result :
8000150: e6ff0f30
On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
...
function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe;
asm
rbit r0, r0
// rbit reverses the whole word, so now you have
// your value in bits 31-24... so shift right by that amount
// should fix this up (bits 23-0 contain junk, we shif
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:54 +0200, Ludo Brands wrote:
> > Thanks all for your replies.
> > I already found the RBIT-instruction. I also found out I need
> > to study
> > the arm assembly language ;-)
> >
> > But how do I get my variable ? Is that in some register ? Is
> > there any
> > do
