On Monday 22 March 2004 12:47, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download
> > code etc :)
> >
> > I thought I'd let you know just in case you forgot to unlock it =D
>
> No, this is a public website and I checked the URL I gave you, it
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schatzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]high performance counter for dos/tp7
> Hello,
>
> >
> > But ehm... it seems your website i
Hello,
>
> But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download code
> etc :)
>
> I thought I'd let you know just in case you forgot to unlock it =D
No, this is a public website and I checked the URL I gave you, it works fine
from my place. Same goes for the links to the sources,
Well I just finished implementing my own high performance unit for timing
and timeouts etc... using bios tick count and pit tick count...
thx to some large document ;)
So I thought I'd now give your stuff a look/try :)
But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download code
et
Hello,
> > So a computer calling an interrupt routine a million times (for
microsecond
> > accuracy) that does not seem like a good idea performance wise.
> >
> > Also calculating the control word (?) can be inaccurate (?):
control_word
> > := $1234DD div frequency; ( ??? what about the remainder
> So a computer calling an interrupt routine a million times (for microsecond
> accuracy) that does not seem like a good idea performance wise.
>
> Also calculating the control word (?) can be inaccurate (?): control_word
> := $1234DD div frequency; ( ??? what about the remainder ??? )
>
> So I
