Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release Candidate 3 of 4.0

On 3/25/25 15:02, Martin Guy via fpc-pascal wrote: On 25/03/25 13:55, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the third release candidate of Lazarus 4.0. What is Lazarus? I have been unable to find anything on its web sites that say what it is or what it do

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Lazarus server under DDOS

Cloudflare offers DDOS protection even on the Free plan: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans/ https://www.cloudflare.com/ddos/ It is easy to set up and works really well. Denis On 01/10/2024 10:00, Marc Weustink via lazarus wrote: Hi, The Lazarus server is currently under heavy DDOS. This affe

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Lazarus server under DDOS

Note: As a consequence, the GitHub Action https://github.com/gcarreno/setup-lazarus also fails now. Trying to use it to install FPC+Lazarus results in an error Error: getPackageList -- Request timeout: /packagelist.json in GitHub Action workflow output. I guess because the action downloads htt

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Running FPC in the browser...

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Wayne Sherman via fpc-pascal wrote: On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 3:20 AM Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Thanks to the efforts of Nikolay Nikolov, the FPC compiler can now recompile itself to webassembly I just watched an interesting talk from StrangeLoop called: "Inside the Wiz

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Running FPC in the browser...

On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 3:20 AM Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > Thanks to the efforts of Nikolay Nikolov, the FPC compiler can now recompile > itself to webassembly I just watched an interesting talk from StrangeLoop called: "Inside the Wizard Research Engine" by Ben L. Titzer https://www.youtube.co

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] GStreamer API unit added

Hello Michael, I would be very interested in this. Is there a link to the source and the example code please? Thanks - Aruna On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:45 AM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < laza...@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > For all people interested in sound/video streaming:

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] [Pas2js] FPC and WebAssembly

Thanks, I was specifically looking for this demo! Happy new year, and kudos for the great work. Regards; Tarnyko Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus writes: And yes, we can do graphics too: https://www.freepascal.org/~michael/pas2js-demos/wasienv/terminal/ That should obviously be: ht

Re: [fpc-pascal] lazarus ide space/dot display

On 06/04/2021 18:26, jean-françois Jouvet via fpc-pascal wrote: does anyone knows how avoid display dot point for space between 2 words? Thanks in advance Menu: Tools > Options Page: Editor > General > Miscellaneous: Turn off "Show special characters" That will turn off tabs and spaces anywhe

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.12

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:15:12 +0100, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: >The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 2.0.12. > HELP! I just installed 2.0.12 on an Ubuntu Mate 20.04 and when I use the form designer the Object Inspector dropdown lists where one selects among fixe

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

Op 02-09-2020 om 00:21 schreef Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal: On Tue, 01 Sep 2020 23:55:08 +0200, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote: Well, I believe that this supposed mystery may be resolved easily. ;-) First of all - have you tried to find out what does the displayed error number (232) mean? Qui

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:34:23 +0200, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote: >On 2020-09-02 00:21, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: > > . > . >> Strange because I have read that cthreads must be first in uses in the >> lpr program files in order to make threads work. >> How could it work if I add the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On 2020-09-02 00:21, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: . . Strange because I have read that cthreads must be first in uses in the lpr program files in order to make threads work. How could it work if I add the dependencies, then it would come later or maybe earlier??? The real requirement is

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On Tue, 01 Sep 2020 23:55:08 +0200, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote: >Well, I believe that this supposed mystery may be resolved easily. ;-) >First of all - have you tried to find out what does the displayed error >number (232) mean? Quick searching reveals that runtime error 232 may >signali

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On 2020-09-01 23:44, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: On Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:46:55 +0200, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: Hi, Further to this mystery: If I remove LazSerialPort from the dependencies and instead put SdpoSerialLaz there instead it also solves the problem: - Program builds

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:46:55 +0200, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: >STRANGE "SOLUTION", BUT WHY? > >So even though I am not really using *anything* in LazSerial I added >LazSerialPort back to the dependencies and rebuilt the application. >Now the thread creation doe

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus complains that it cannot find a dependency, why?

On Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:07:56 +0200, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: >I get an error message when building a project after updating from SVN >to get the sources that build fine on another RPi4 identical in >configuration. > >"Fatal: Cannot find LazSerial used by RemoteIO. Check if package >LazSe

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus start problem after power outage on RPi4

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:59:19 +0200, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: >> Can I copy this file from an RPi3B where I have installed the same >> versions of Lazarus and Fpc in the same file locations (I use the same >> install scripts on all RPi:s)? > >Yes. >After start fix the paths in Tools

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus start problem after power outage on RPi4

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:12:19 +0200 Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal wrote: > Tonight there was a power outage in my home where I have a RaspberryPi > 4B development system with Lazarus 2.0.8 and Fpc 3.0.4. > > When it happened the system was running including Lazarus. > Now when I start Lazarus I get

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Tomas Hajny wrote: On 2020-08-05 11:38, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('http

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On 2020-08-05 11:38, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the err

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support comp

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it? Simply add one of the units opensslsoc

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it? Simply add one of the units opensslsockets or gnutlssockets to the uses clause of the program.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, LacaK wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it? Simply add one of the units opensslsockets or gnutlssockets to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it? Simply add one of the units opensslsockets or gnutlssockets to the uses clause of the program. Can

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 TFPHTTPClient no longer supports https

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Dennis wrote: After upgrading to Lazarus 2.0.10 FPC 3.2.0 , my existing code using TFPHTTPClient.Get('https://api.telegram.org/bot') returns the error "No SSL Socket support compiled in" How can I fix it? Simply add one of the units opensslsockets or gnutlssockets to th

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] It's alive !

Am 21.09.2019 um 15:22 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus: Hello, Finally, the moment has come: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xos2MnVxe-c Following up on a bounty offered, Dmitry Boyarintsev has accomplished milestone one in the implementation of FPC's webassembly backend. And: It's

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Anthony Walter wrote: Ben, After this hurricane Dorian situation is over (I live in Cape Canaveral Florida), I will be adding many parsers to the original test page I linked at the top of this thread. I will be revising the numbers and charts, adding more notes per this t

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

Ben, After this hurricane Dorian situation is over (I live in Cape Canaveral Florida), I will be adding many parsers to the original test page I linked at the top of this thread. I will be revising the numbers and charts, adding more notes per this thread and some more which I feel are notable, an

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 9:40 AM Anthony Walter wrote: > > Could you include https://github.com/BeRo1985/pasjson in the comparison? > > Sure. I also have a few other people have requested. I will also list the > license of each in the first table. > Note that I'm not sure if it's FPC-compatible,

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Anthony Walter wrote: Could you include https://github.com/BeRo1985/pasjson in the comparison? Sure. I also have a few other people have requested. I will also list the license of each in the first table. [snip] For example if wanted to store object state using RTTI

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

> Could you include https://github.com/BeRo1985/pasjson in the comparison? Sure. I also have a few other people have requested. I will also list the license of each in the first table. Regarding a huge gigabytes of JSON in a file, I know a small portion of programmers of people might be inclined

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Anthony Walter via lazarus wrote: Okay, so I turned on my Windows VM with a different version of FPC and ran VerifyUnicodeChars with both FPJson and JsonTools. The resutls are the same. JsonTools sees the unicode correctly, and something is wrong when using FPJson. I don't

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

Okay, so I turned on my Windows VM with a different version of FPC and ran VerifyUnicodeChars with both FPJson and JsonTools. The resutls are the same. JsonTools sees the unicode correctly, and something is wrong when using FPJson. I don't know what the problem is, but other people are noticing sim

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

For those tracking the unicode issue, could you please verify the problem does not present in my JsonTools library on compiler revisions and platforms? I always get true (passed) with my library, but not with any other library. Here is the relevant test: function VerifyUnicodeChars: Boolean; const

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Anthony Walter via lazarus wrote: Alan, oh that's a good idea. I will do that as well as add a few more parser libraries as requested by a few people in other non mailing lists threads. I will also try to find out what's going on the unicode strings as it might be a proble

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] Tests results of several pascal based JSON parsers

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Anthony Walter via lazarus wrote: With regards to duplicate key names, some libraries allow for the same key to be parsed resulting in multiple child nodes of the same name. Others throw an exception when parsing an object with a duplicate key name. The correct way to han

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 22:36:07 CEST Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: > Packages / Install Packages > Select anchordockingdsgn on the right side and click "Install > selection". > Then "Save and rebuild IDE". Habe jetzt das ganz neue Debian 10 - mit apt-get install lazarus (2.0.0) - au

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 16/04/2019 21:18, Tomas Hajny wrote: > whatever that would be called. Please, stop it (everybody). Sorry, I read messages in the order my email client sorted them. Only saw your message after I posted my reply. I'll not take part in futher off-topic discussions. Regards, Graeme

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 16/04/2019 19:49, Rainer Stratmann wrote: >> Anyone who seriously develops software, specially desktop applications, >> is/should be using at least two (better 3 monitors). > > That is completely new for me that the amount of monitors is an indication of > how professional someone can write goo

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 22:36:07 CEST Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:13:52 +0200 > > Rainer Stratmann wrote: > > On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 21:02:50 CEST Rainer Stratmann wrote: > > > But how can I install/activate it. > > > > I found an instruction, but I

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Martin Frb wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:03, Ralf Quint wrote: Schwachfug. (Bollocks for the Anglophiles around here) And for those with American English: B*S* But I really dont see where to put 2nd, let alone a 3rd  50 inch screen. ;) ;) ;) ... not (unfortunately) https:

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:24:09 +0200, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: >Here is the list of fixes for Lazarus 2.0.x: >http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0_fixes_branch > Thanks, I decided to check out the branch 2.0.x rather than tag 2.0.0 and then 2.0.2 etc, Seems like it would be easier

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

Hi, since I need glasses, it is already troublesome to read a single screen. With strong glasses just one point on the screen is really sharp and when the glasses shift a little, you end up seeing only on one eye properly Cheers, Benito Am 16.04.19 um 22:17 schrieb Martin Wynne: I have on

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

I have only 2 eyes, so I'm going to find 3 screens a problem. Martin. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:13:52 +0200 Rainer Stratmann wrote: > On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 21:02:50 CEST Rainer Stratmann wrote: > > But how can I install/activate it. > > I found an instruction, but I got an error: > > lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Kann anchordockingdsgn nicht finden verwendet > von

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 13:07:33 CEST Ralf Quint wrote: > But I still think that this should not be the default setting... As you may have not seen while being busy with something else... I repeat it for you. On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 20:44:56 CEST Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 16/04/2019 22:17, Ralf Quint wrote: On 4/16/2019 1:11 PM, Martin Frb wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:03, Ralf Quint wrote: Schwachfug. (Bollocks for the Anglophiles around here) And for those with American English: B*S* But I really dont see where to put 2nd, let alone a 3rd  50 inch screen. ;)

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, April 16, 2019 22:03, Ralf Quint wrote: > On 4/16/2019 11:49 AM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: . . >> That is completely new for me that the amount of monitors is an >> indication of >> how professional someone can write good software. . . > It's just a very efficient way to work, as you don'

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 4/16/2019 1:11 PM, Martin Frb wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:03, Ralf Quint wrote: Schwachfug. (Bollocks for the Anglophiles around here) And for those with American English: B*S* But I really dont see where to put 2nd, let alone a 3rd  50 inch screen. ;) ;) ;) Showoff! :P Ralf ;-) PS: Serio

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 16/04/2019 22:03, Ralf Quint wrote: Schwachfug. (Bollocks for the Anglophiles around here) And for those with American English: B*S* But I really dont see where to put 2nd, let alone a 3rd  50 inch screen. ;) ;) ;) ... not (unfortunately) SCNR ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 4/16/2019 11:44 AM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:37:56 -0700 Ralf Quint wrote: [...] Anyone who seriously develops software, specially desktop applications, is/should be using at least two (better 3 monitors). And the "many" different windows allow easily to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 4/16/2019 11:49 AM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 11:37:56 CEST Ralf Quint wrote: On 4/16/2019 4:46 AM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Anyone who seriously develops software, specially desktop applications, is/should be using at least two (better 3 monitors). That is completel

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 21:02:50 CEST Rainer Stratmann wrote: > But how can I install/activate it. I found an instruction, but I got an error: lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Kann anchordockingdsgn nicht finden verwendet von Lazarus. Check if package AnchorDockingDsgn creates anchordockingdsgn.ppu,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:02:50 +0200 Rainer Stratmann wrote: > On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 14:34:05 CEST Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > You can install the AnchorDockingDsgn package and have all windows > > integrated (except for forms which need an additional package). > > That sounds g

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 14:34:05 CEST Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: > You can install the AnchorDockingDsgn package and have all windows > integrated (except for forms which need an additional package). That sounds good for both use cases. But how can I install/activate it. I tried with a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 11:37:56 CEST Ralf Quint wrote: > On 4/16/2019 4:46 AM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: > Anyone who seriously develops software, specially desktop applications, > is/should be using at least two (better 3 monitors). That is completely new for me that the amount of monitors is

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:37:56 -0700 Ralf Quint wrote: >[...] > Anyone who seriously develops software, specially desktop > applications, is/should be using at least two (better 3 monitors). > And the "many" different windows allow easily to spread those out to > those various screens as needed. On

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On 4/16/2019 4:46 AM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Are there plans to merge some windows? Like here (best solution): https://cdn.portableapps.com/GeanyPortable.png Because I think it is no more up to date. I don't know any other Software that uses so many windows across the whole desktop. It would b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Are there plans to merge some windows? Like here (best solution): https://cdn.portableapps.com/GeanyPortable.png Rainer, there's an add-on that's included with Lazarus that will "dock" all the windows to give a more "modern" Delphi UI vs the stan

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions (screen reader)

About ctrl+shift+arrow key: Do you know any documentation on how to implement this. What API to call, to let the screen reader know? Also for other modifications needed, any documentation? -- On 16/04/2019 14:31, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote: For now, I would like to thank you, that you have allow

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

Rainer Stratmann schrieb am Di., 16. Apr. 2019, 13:47: > Are there plans to merge some windows? > > Like here (best solution): > https://cdn.portableapps.com/GeanyPortable.png > > Because I think it is no more up to date. > I don't know any other Software that uses so many windows across the whol

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

Because I do not see at all and I Am using screen reader NVDA, it would be ideal, if so much of Lazarus GUI would be 100 % accessible. But I know, that it is very complex to retain screen readers accessibility, friendly look for sighted users and fast IDE responsiveness. For now, I would like to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

On Dienstag, 16. April 2019 13:46:59 CEST Rainer Stratmann wrote: > buttons of the main window. Also the output window could be one tab of the > search window. I mean search result window more precisely. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freep

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 2.0.2 - suggestions

Are there plans to merge some windows? Like here (best solution): https://cdn.portableapps.com/GeanyPortable.png Because I think it is no more up to date. I don't know any other Software that uses so many windows across the whole desktop. It would be more userfriendly to merge at least the main

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus and Linked Lists

> Is there a basic linked List object for Lazarus? https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_3_0_4/packages/fcl-stl/src/glinkedlist.pp -- Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus and Cocoa

Ryan Joseph schrieb am So., 17. Juni 2018, 11:34: > I’m trying to make a lazarus control which wraps an NSView but I haven’t > used Lazarus before and I don’t really understand the architecture of the > system. It looks like a TForm is essentially a window and TWinControl is > perhaps what I need

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Mailing list down?

On 04/03/2018 07:00 AM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote: Hi All. I haven't gotten any mails on the Lazarus mailing list since 31/03-2018 - and the two mails I sent today doesn't seem to have gone through. this one seems to have made the trip just fine... Kind regards, Torsten. __

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Mailing list down?

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote: Hi All. I haven't gotten any mails on the Lazarus mailing list since 31/03-2018 - and the two mails I sent today doesn't seem to have gone through. I have the same problem. Michael. ___ fpc-p

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.8

Hello, 2017-12-07 9:36 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner : > The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.8. > > The release was built with FPC 3.0.4. > The previous release Lazarus 1.6.4 was built with FPC 3.0.2. > > Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal: > http://wik

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.8

Mattias Gaertner wrote: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.8. The release was built with FPC 3.0.4. The previous release Lazarus 1.6.4 was built with FPC 3.0.2. Congratulations and thank you for your great work. Dennis

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus cannot debug after Raspbian upgrade

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:01:35 +0200, Bo Berglund wrote: Sorry, I selected the wrong group when posting. Moved to Lazarus. -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-b

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Michael Ring wrote: Most likely that Embarcadero has shut down their development Branch in Spain, about 80 people involved. Yes. The foundation was founded already in 2015, but because of busy schedules, we didn't activate it yet. The news about Embarcadero simply pu

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Marc Hanisch wrote: Hello, very nice to hear about the foundation. Are you open for personal members? That is the idea, but we still need to adapt the bylaws to allow this. I would be interested in promoting Lazarus and Free Pascal. When you get donations, how is the

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

On 27/06/16 15:47, Michael Ring wrote: Most likely that Embarcadero has shut down their development Branch in Spain, about 80 people involved. Michael When I read the news this morning I was astonished, I didn't know that Embarcadero had such a big team in Spain (I am Spanish). In the gro

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

Most likely that Embarcadero has shut down their development Branch in Spain, about 80 people involved. Michael Am 27.06.16 um 15:24 schrieb Tony Caduto: What events of the last few days is Boian talking about in his announcement? On Jun 27, 2016 5:51 AM, "Victor Campillo"

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

What events of the last few days is Boian talking about in his announcement? On Jun 27, 2016 5:51 AM, "Victor Campillo" wrote: On 27/06/16 10:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: How did you manage to find this site ? I didn't make a public announcement yet :-) But seems that somebody else did it, se

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

It's already on Heise News (german): http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Stiftung-fuer-Free-Pascal-und-Lazarus-gegruendet-3249526.html Am 27.06.16 um 12:51 schrieb Victor Campillo: On 27/06/16 10:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: How did you manage to find this site ? I didn't make a public a

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

On 27/06/16 10:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: How did you manage to find this site ? I didn't make a public announcement yet :-) But seems that somebody else did it, see this post of Boian Mitov https://plus.google.com/+BoianMitov/posts/46r34KmgrdQ.

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

Hello, very nice to hear about the foundation. Are you open for personal members? I would be interested in promoting Lazarus and Free Pascal. When you get donations, how is the money split to the projects and who decides about which project is getting how much? Best regards, Marc 2016-06-27 10:0

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] FreePascal and Lazarus Foundation

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Mr Bee wrote: Hi all, This morning I was glad to found this website: http://foundation.freepascal.org It's about time to have a foundation for our beloved projects. I hope by having this foundation, Free Pascal and Lazarus projects would go forward, being managed better a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

On Friday 08 April 2016 17:08:08 Anthony Tekatch wrote: > > Can MSEgui/MSEide be used to make programs for Mac OSX ? > Currently not. In case of OSX-X11 compatibility layer the effort probably is manageable. I would prefer a Quartz backend. Sponsors wanted! ;-) Martin

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

My very short list: Pro Lazarus: - The LCL is very compatible with the Delphi VCL and so you can easily port Delphi VCL applications to Linux (but for reasons I don't understand Delphi moved to Firemonkey). - On top of that there is a great number of rather compatible "widget types" that all

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:08:41 +0200, "Santiago A." wrote: > Cons. The most important. It looks like Lazarus has more developers, so > may be a better decision for the long term. > The second is the RAD. The immediate two directions updates, from GUI to > source and from source to GUI, is very hand

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

> Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even before > Lazarus introduced them. Please ask on the MSEide+MSEgui mailinglist if you > like to know how it works. > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.mseide.user > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

On Friday 08 April 2016 13:33:35 Krzysztof wrote: > > I'm using MSEide only for design forms. For coding I'm still use > Lazarus (with paths to MSEgui source) so I still can enjoy with > Lazarus code completition, build modes etc. Just a little hint: MSEide has "build modes". IIRC it had it even b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

> > Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with > > LCL projects. > > Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in > compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many > times before. Oooops, I did not know that it was possible. So,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

On 2016-04-08 12:34, Fred van Stappen wrote: > Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with > LCL projects. Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many times before. Regards, - Gr

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

> con of mside why I don't use it: > > The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the > line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Huh, what do you mean ? I do not feel any difference with other editors... The big plus, IMO, of MSEide is his weight. : less

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

2016-04-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Rainer Stratmann : > con of mside why I don't use it: > > The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the > line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult > to > integrate which I find hard to understand. That b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

con of mside why I don't use it: The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the line as it is usual in almost every other editor. Martin says it is difficult to integrate which I find hard to understand. That behaviour of the cursor confuses me. The other editors

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

On 2016-04-08 10:08, Santiago A. wrote: > Any body has experience in both (or another IDE for FPC) and has his two > cents? ps: It's MSEide - if you are refering to the IDE portion of the project. ;-) I switch between Lazarus and MSEide very frequently. Overall I prefer MSEide. Yes it's settings

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus vs MSEgui

I'm also learning MSEgui from a few weeks. It was very hard start but now I love it. First what you need understand is that it is not using any Qt, Gtk, WinAPI backend as Lazarus so you never get native OS look but of course you can imitate it with own style. Yes, MSEgui has styles engine. For exam

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] PDF generator

On 2016-03-06 07:35, Roberto P. wrote: > Are metadata included ? If you mean information like Author, Creation Date, PDF Producer, Application Name, Title etc then the answer is yes. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fr

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Lazarus] PDF generator

Great! Are metadata included ? Thanks, R. 2016-03-05 18:27 GMT+01:00 Michael Van Canneyt : > Hi, > > I have committed a PDF generator to FPC Subversion: fcl-pdf. > > Why a new pascal PDF generator ? Mainly because the existing ones written > in Object Pascal suffer from > several disadvantages

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.6

nice! it worked fine! thanks Philippe De: fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org em nome de Juha Manninen Enviado: sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 21:38 Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.6 On Sun, Feb 21

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.6

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Philippe Lévi wrote: > I still do not understand the reason why the size is 10 times bigger after > rebuilding Lazarus ... Open Tools -> Configure "Build Lazarus" ... dialog. Select profile "Optimized IDE". You can also use -O3 optimization in options. Then build

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus Release 1.6

... Thanks and sorry for may be useless messages! Philippe De: fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org em nome de Philippe Lévi Enviado: sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 16:14 Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus

  1   2   3   4   5   >