On 10 Nov 12, at 0:28, ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> > On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:38, ik wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> >>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
.
.
> Cardinal is a bit problematic type, you mean lon
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:38, ik wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
wrote:
> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote
On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:38, ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
>>> wrote:
On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
And if I do it without the hash, then it's just
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
>> wrote:
>>> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>>>
>>> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>>>
>>>
>>> UCS4Char is in fact just a n
On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
> wrote:
>> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>>
>> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>>
>>
>> UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic
>> array of
>> cardina
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>
> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>
>
> UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic array of
> cardinal. UCS4 is not implemented as a complete string type i
On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic
array of cardinal. UCS4 is not implemented as a complete string type
in FPC (or Delphi, for that matter).
Jonas__