> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Jonas Maebe
> Envoyé : vendredi 5 juin 2015 10:52
> À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] valgrind: "
Pierre Free Pascal wrote on Fri, 05 Jun 2015:
I am not sure I understand why it is a false positive:
The read size is 16, at offset 16, which make it read up to position 32,
while only 30 byte were allocated...
What is wrong in my analysis above?
These kinds of algorithms don't actually us
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Jonas Maebe
> Envoyé : jeudi 4 juin 2015 19:51
> À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] valgrind: "
David Emerson wrote on Thu, 04 Jun 2015:
I have just started using valgrind, and I was surprised that I got a
lot of errors, particularly in places that look like clean code. So
I whittled things down and created a test program. Here is the error
I am seeing (I've removed the procid, ==111
