Am 24.01.2021 um 20:58 schrieb Noel Duffy via fpc-pascal:
On 24/01/21 11:53 pm, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 24.01.2021 um 08:37 schrieb Noel Duffy via fpc-pascal:
How should one go about adding unit tests to a package in the RTL?
In many packages, for instance fcl-db, there is a tests f
On 24/01/21 11:53 pm, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 24.01.2021 um 08:37 schrieb Noel Duffy via fpc-pascal:
How should one go about adding unit tests to a package in the RTL? In many
packages, for instance fcl-db, there is a tests folder with fpcunit units and
programs in them, and they'r
Am 24.01.2021 um 08:37 schrieb Noel Duffy via fpc-pascal:
How should one go about adding unit tests to a package in the RTL? In
many packages, for instance fcl-db, there is a tests folder with
fpcunit units and programs in them, and they're referenced in
fpmake.pp as example programs, but these
Oh it is very promising programmers approach. I Am even dreaming about
live Internet radio player written by using Pas2JS. I have analysed
included units and I have found Webaudio unit.
BUt I Am afraid, that opening live stream with .MP3 live stream and play
it from Pascal source by using Pas2JS
Le 09/08/2019 à 12:22, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel a écrit :
Does somebody of you know about Lazarus compatible Unit, which is able
to create Windows GUi with no need to specify object position values
in points or in Pixels?
Something similar like VCL units have for commercial BOrland Delphi.
Or unfortu
Hello.
There is ideU, a child of mseide that is voice-assisted and gives also the
position of the mouse by voice.
https://github.com/fredvs/ideU/releases
Fre:D
-
Many thanks ;-)
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
On Saturday 23 April 2016 11:18:48 Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:40:58 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/user/usersu7.html#x21-28000
> > >3. 1.2 states:
> > > "
> > > You can add a directory to the unit search p
On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:40:58 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/user/usersu7.html#x21-280003.
> >1.2 states:
> > "
> > You can add a directory to the unit search path with the (-Fu (see page
> > 100)) option. Every occurrence of one of
Martin Schreiber wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/user/usersu7.html#x21-280003.1.2
states:
"
You can add a directory to the unit search path with the (-Fu (see page 100))
option. Every occurrence of one of these options will insert a directory to
the unit search path. i.e. the
> after a whole night of unsuccessful googling I’m still wondering, which
unit(s) I have to use to find a type definition of PHostEnt in linux. I need
it for the gethostbyname function.
>
> In Windows it’s defined in winsock and there should be an equivalent
> record in linux according to systems
El 23/9/2015 12:25 PM, Rainer Stratmann escribió:
Rather than saving the state in a static way, I prefer implementing a
Push/Pop (LIFO queue) approach to allow for nested pairs of setting and
restoring, like this:
Type IOsCollection = {Any sort of collection, array, list, or record
with lin
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
> Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> > Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
>
> You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
> thread (the last one).
There is not enough information available
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 22:40:32 you wrote:
> What means CRT for ? :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode_ray_tube
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
What means CRT for ? :)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 18:24:54 you wrote:
> On 23/09/15 15:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
> >> >Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> >>> > >Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
> >> >
> >> >You posted the ro
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 18:24:54 you wrote:
> On 23/09/15 15:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
> >> >Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> >>> > >Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
> >> >
> >> >You posted the ro
On 23/09/15 15:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
>Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> >Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
>
>You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
>thread (the last one)
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
thread (the last one).
http://man7.org/linux/ma
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
> Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> > Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
>
> You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
> thread (the last one).
>
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/te
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 13:19:28 you wrote:
> Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
> > Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
>
> You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
> thread (the last one).
Ok, I guess the ONOCR flag in c_oflag bit
Rainer Stratmann wrote on Wed, 23 Sep 2015:
Does an example exist to turn off (and on) the rawmode?
You posted the routine to do that yourself in the first mail of this
thread (the last one).
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Does it have something to do with the output of Linux commands?
Now the outputs are:
Message 1
Message 2
Message 3
How is it possible to get the normal behaviour?
stty sane
Note that is doesn't so much affect the out
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 12:05:43 you wrote:
> In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > Does it have something to do with the output of Linux commands?
>
> Yes. In raw mode cr and lf are separate. so suddenly your lf only advances
> to the next line, but doesn't reset the carriag
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> Does it have something to do with the output of Linux commands?
Yes. In raw mode cr and lf are separate. so suddenly your lf only advances
to the next line, but doesn't reset the carriage to the first column.
Use TProcess to capture the command ou
Does it have something to do with the output of Linux commands?
Now the outputs are:
Message 1
Message 2
Message 3
How is it possible to get the normal behaviour?
Message 1
Message 2
Message 3
On Wednesday 23 September 2015 11:46:15 you wrot
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
What does SetRawMode do?
Applies CFMakeRaw.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
What does SetRawMode do?
puts the terminal in RAW mode.
This disables usual terminal tricks such as translating CTRL-C to SIGINT etc.
A terminal does quite some things 'behind your back', which are not desirable
for the CRT unit.
Michael.
> When using the crt unit the CR LF is not working properly as I understand.
quite the opposite, crt makes CR LF works as intended per character (see
last answer)
> Is it possible to change this behaviour?
yes, don't use crt
> So that the CR LF is working?
Back to first answer
> For examlp
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
Does FPC support unit alias commandline parameter like Delphi?
"
-A= = Set unit alias
"
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE3/en/DCC32.EXE,_the_Delphi_Command_Line_Compiler
Not to my knowledge.
It was, at the time, a conscious decisi
On 19.01.2013 10:41, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
Does FPC support unit alias commandline parameter like Delphi?
"
-A= = Set unit alias
"
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE3/en/DCC32.EXE,_the_Delphi_Command_Line_Compiler
No, it doesn't.
And as this is normally only used for the dep
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Martin wrote:
On 22/08/2012 18:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
for those that do unit testing, I committed a small tool "pas2ut" which
analyses a unit, and creates a unit with a number of (empty) test cases.
Obviously, the unit should be compileable (well, at least
Am 22.08.2012 21:56, schrieb Martin:
On 22/08/2012 18:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
for those that do unit testing, I committed a small tool "pas2ut" which
analyses a unit, and creates a unit with a number of (empty) test
cases. Obviously, the unit should be compileable (well, at least it
Am 22.08.2012 21:56, schrieb Martin:
On 22/08/2012 18:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
for those that do unit testing, I committed a small tool "pas2ut" which
analyses a unit, and creates a unit with a number of (empty) test
cases. Obviously, the unit should be compileable (well, at least it
On 22/08/2012 18:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hi,
for those that do unit testing, I committed a small tool "pas2ut" which
analyses a unit, and creates a unit with a number of (empty) test
cases. Obviously, the unit should be compileable (well, at least it
must be
parseable).
I just updat
On 22 August 2012 18:47, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
> The obvious example: insert calls to logging procedures at the enter
> and exit of each method, procedure or function of a unit.
This is already possible for some time. Take a look at the
'fpprofiler' project. I have a version of it that I worked
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> I would appreaciate feedback and
suggestions.
I believe could be interesting to have a similar tool to generate
"annotations" to a unit(or set of units).
The obvious example: insert calls to logging procedures at the enter
and exit of each m
On 12.06.2012 18:27, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2012 18:04, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 12.06.2012 15:20 schrieb "kyan":
.
.
The problem is that function
GetModuleName() is stubbed out in WinCE (and Linux):
unit SysUtils.inc;
function GetModuleName(Module: HMODULE): string;
begin
{$ifd
On Tue, June 12, 2012 18:04, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 12.06.2012 15:20 schrieb "kyan" :
.
.
>> The problem is that function
>> GetModuleName() is stubbed out in WinCE (and Linux):
>>
>> unit SysUtils.inc;
>>
>> function GetModuleName(Module: HMODULE): string;
>> begin
>> {$ifdef MSWINDOWS}
>> SetL
Thank you for your reply Sven.
> It might't be that Windows (or CE only) initalizes a library only if you use
> GetProcAddress at least once... I have not tested that, but it might be an
> idea. If that is the case we can not influence that.
No need to, it really doesn't matter since one has to d
Am 12.06.2012 15:20 schrieb "kyan" :
>
> OK, I apologize. It seems that the problem lies elsewhere. The fact
> that library initialization seems to be deferred until you do a
> GetProcAddress() confused me.
It might't be that Windows (or CE only) initalizes a library only if you
use GetProcAddress
OK, I apologize. It seems that the problem lies elsewhere. The fact
that library initialization seems to be deferred until you do a
GetProcAddress() confused me. The problem is that function
GetModuleName() is stubbed out in WinCE (and Linux):
unit SysUtils.inc;
function GetModuleName(Module: HMO
Am 11.06.2012 12:25, schrieb kyan:
Does unit initialization in libraries (.dll files) work in arm/WinCE?
From the startup code of arm-wince I don't see why it should not work...
Somehow it seems that even code placed in the library initialization
begin end block isn't executed either.
How d
Den 12-02-2011 13:26, Dejan Boras skrev:
Okay, this works nicely. I do realize it should be done automatically, but for
whatever reason it does not, and I am not sure if this is something Android
related or a fpc bug. Thanks.
It's probably fpc rtl related. It's a certain flavour of Linux that h
Okay, this works nicely. I do realize it should be done automatically, but for
whatever reason it does not, and I am not sure if this is something Android
related or a fpc bug. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From:Paul Ishenin
To:Dejan Boras ; FPC-Pascal users discussions
Cc:
Sent:Satu
12.02.2011 16:36, Dejan Boras wrote:
I've got a library which runs on Android, and is loaded by a Java program. The
INITIALIZATION sections of units do not seem to be called, is there a way to do
this manually, or am I missing something?
It must be done automatically but you can force it yours
Al 31/05/10 18:25, En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
For instance, the first point I met is a literal notation for records "r := (a:1 ;
b:2);". But fpc refuses that to me :-( (Same result with array notations.)
FPC indeed does not support this, and I'm not aware of any immediate plans to
add supp
On 31 May 2010, at 16:16, spir ☣ wrote:
> I'm converting a few components, first developped in independant programs,
> into units. I have 2 issues in the process.
>
> -1- internal dependency
> How can an interface element E0 depend on an implementation element E1?
It cannot, regardless of the
David W Noon writes:
Incidentally, from your first message in this thread, you said you were
writing an OLAP application. You might care to look at PostgreSQL as a
database manager. It does rather nice OLAP functionality, straight out
of the box -- and it's free.
Somewhat offtopic...
Im a full
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 16:51 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt writes:
>
> > You can also try the Classes unit if you use object oriented programming.
> > Each component can write itself to stream.
>
> Played a little bit with the Classes unit.
> Don't really see any benefit ove
Michael Van Canneyt writes:
You can also try the Classes unit if you use object oriented programming.
Each component can write itself to stream.
Played a little bit with the Classes unit.
Don't really see any benefit over justin writing records directly.
Am I missing something?
Also when read
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> I looked through the contributed units in the http://freepascal.org site and
> did not see anything that could take an array or some other data structure and
> write it to disk. Also the library would need to do the opposite, read from
> disk into a d
Tomas Hajny rašė:
Isn't Fps one of the third party front-ends for fpc (with completely
independent versioning, of course)?
Yes, "FPS is system consisting from graphical user interface and
integrated Free Pascal compiler."
(http://ims.mii.lt/fps/en/devel/index.html).
--
Valdas Jankūnas
On Monday 17 March 2008 06:40:51 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2008, at 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is the use of the move procedure right? The array length is
> > Maximum-1. When I
> > put this length on value[1], the last entry value[Maximum-1] would
> > be deleted
> > or would be shifte
On 17 Mar 2008, at 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need more informations about the move() procedure form unit system.
I want to shift an array (values:array[0..Maximum-1] of single) like
the
following lines:
for i:=Maximum-1 downto 1 do values[i]:=values[i-1];
values[0]:=sameothervalue;
On Sat, March 15, 2008 12:58, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> Why I can't to run unit - programa say: 'Illegal unit name' I try Fps
>> 0.9.6and 0.6.4 program versions.
>
> Units are not runnable, FPC versions before 1.0 are from the 1900s. Maybe
> you mean the version of something else?
>
> If on Linu
> Why I can't to run unit - programa say: 'Illegal unit name' I try Fps
> 0.9.6and 0.6.4 program versions.
Units are not runnable, FPC versions before 1.0 are from the 1900s. Maybe
you mean the version of something else?
If on Linux, your source file must be either lowercase, or match the casing
On 14 Mar 2008, at 21:30, europietis N wrote:
Why I can't to run unit - programa say: 'Illegal unit name'
Make sure the unit name matches the file name that contains it.
I try Fps 0.9.6and
0.6.4 program versions.
These are quite strange versions. FPC 0.6.4 was released somewhere in
1995
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 30/08/2007, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > User's manual, section 5.3 "Variable substitution in paths".
> >
>
>
> That obvious!! ;-) Thanks Michael. It works perfectly now.
>
> PS:
> Not sure if I told you, but tiOPF
On 30/08/2007, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Using custom fpc config files has its own issues, see
> http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9450
>
> The config file handling was simply not designed with this purpose in
> mind. fpcmake really is quite easy to use.
Funny that. It
On 30 Aug 2007, at 14:11, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Ummm... damn. I was hoping to get away from Makefile's (for CLI
users) and instead use a custom extrafpc.cfg file in each of the
important directories. I guess it's back to reading the manual on
Makefile.fpc and fpcmake.
Using custom fpc co
On 30/08/2007, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess you mean -FU...
Ah yes. That's what I meant.
> > How can I force the compiler to create the output directory if it
> > doesn't exist? Is there another parameter for that?
>
> No, the compiler does not create directories, only file
On 30 Aug 2007, at 13:59, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I now specify a unit output path as follows:
-Fu../lib/$fpctarget
I guess you mean -FU...
How can I force the compiler to create the output directory if it
doesn't exist? Is there another parameter for that?
No, the compiler does no
On 30/08/2007, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> User's manual, section 5.3 "Variable substitution in paths".
>
Another question... (sorry). I read the whole chapter 5 and looked at
the fpc parameters and couldn't find any hints.
I now specify a unit output path as follows:
On 30/08/2007, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> User's manual, section 5.3 "Variable substitution in paths".
>
That obvious!! ;-) Thanks Michael. It works perfectly now.
PS:
Not sure if I told you, but tiOPF Core is now GUI free! At last true
non-gui apps can be written. I've
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Under Lazarus I can specify the unit output directory as follows:
> ../../lib/$(TargetCPU)-$(TargetOS)
>
>
> I'm trying to do the same thing from the command line (without
> Lazarus), but FPC doesn't know about the TargetCPU or TargetO
Catalin,
Because it's GPL/GNU? :)
Exactly
[]s
Cesar Romero
On Monday 04 June 2007 04:23, Cesar Romero wrote:
Catalin,
Interesting stuff, unhappily the licence dont allow me to use in my
business app.
[]s
Cesar Romero
Hello,
Just wanted to contribute my two cents wit
Because it's GPL/GNU? :)
On Monday 04 June 2007 04:23, Cesar Romero wrote:
> Catalin,
>
> Interesting stuff, unhappily the licence dont allow me to use in my
> business app.
>
> []s
>
> Cesar Romero
>
> > Hello,
> > Just wanted to contribute my two cents with this homemade Unit [attached
> >
Catalin,
Interesting stuff, unhappily the licence dont allow me to use in my
business app.
[]s
Cesar Romero
Hello,
Just wanted to contribute my two cents with this homemade Unit [attached to
the mail] for working with:
- Simple Linked Lists;
- Double Linked Lists;
- Stacks;
Don't know
ok i missed some thing
RFC 1912 Common DNS Errors February 1996
Make sure your PTR and A records match. For every IP address, there
should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain. If a
host is multi-homed, (more than one IP address) make su
ok after a long read inside the rfc actually it seem that
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2317
the rfc 2317 specify that the in-addr.arpa can be a CNAME in case of Classless
IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation. less than a /24
so the answer could be a CNAME not only a PTR.
I need to correct the Function
Nice
i try the netbd but i found a "bug",i use the testdns.pp provide in the
directory of netbd.
hostAddrtostr('www.adeli.fr') give the good 195.167.230.4 answer.
but the
H:=StrtoHostAddr('195.167.230.4');
L:=ResolveAddress(H,NAns);
give me 0 result !
i notice that the result for this is pr
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Lionel Drevon wrote:
> I found in the doc the inet unit, but i don't found it under my system nor on
> the web
> on page http://www.freepascal.org/packages/inet.html
> the link ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/source/packages.zip seem to be
> broken!
Try the netdb or resolv
Op Thu, 16 Nov 2006, schreef Rainer Stratmann:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 10:58 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > > does there exist a Demo Program for Unit Sockets?
> > > I want to make a direct IPX connection between 2 Computers.
> > > And later an Internet connection.
> >
> > Which OS?
Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 10:58 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > does there exist a Demo Program for Unit Sockets?
> > I want to make a direct IPX connection between 2 Computers.
> > And later an Internet connection.
>
> Which OS? Anyway, socket is mainly about TCP/IP, and there are demoes in
> does there exist a Demo Program for Unit Sockets?
> I want to make a direct IPX connection between 2 Computers.
> And later an Internet connection.
Which OS? Anyway, socket is mainly about TCP/IP, and there are demoes in the
description of the unit in the manual.
Why do you want to use IPX in t
None of the FPC developers currently has the time nor wish to supportany of the .NET enhancements, and that includes the dot in the unit
names.despite it was originally intended for .net, i don't see it as a .net specific enhancement, but it's ok.
i appreciate your answer. Michael.marianop
We don't support every bug/strange thing delphi supports.ok, i understand your point.
in my very humble opinion it was an interesting idea.If you want to insult people you might do it somewhere else. Thank you.
it was a joke. not aiming to offend anybody.thanks,marianop
On Thu, 25 May 2006, mariano podesta wrote:
> >
> > > > This looks to me like a delphi bug.
>
>
> a bug? are you serious?
>
> A unit must be a valid pascal
> > > > identifier.
>
>
> fpc just support valid standard pascal? this is not what i heard.
> delphi7 supports it since 2002. not a .net rel
mariano podesta wrote:
> > > This looks to me like a delphi bug.
>
>
> a bug? are you serious?
Of course, asdf.asdf is no valid pascal identifier.
>
> A unit must be a valid pascal
> > > identifier.
>
>
> fpc just support valid standard pascal? this is not what i heard.
> delphi
> > This looks to me like a delphi bug.a bug? are you serious?
A unit must be a valid pascal> > identifier.
fpc just support valid standard pascal? this is not what i heard. delphi7 supports it since 2002. not a .net release.
Or is there any use in supporting this?ofcourse there is a use.you see
> On 5/25/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mariano podesta wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > does fpc support unit names with more than one dot or is planned?
> > >
> > > in delphi 7 you can compile this:
> >
> > This looks to me like a delphi bug. A unit must be a valid pascal
> > identifi
On 5/25/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mariano podesta wrote:
> hi,
> does fpc support unit names with more than one dot or is planned?
>
> in delphi 7 you can compile this:
This looks to me like a delphi bug. A unit must be a valid pascal
identifier. Or is there any use in supp
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:42:30 -0300
"mariano podesta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> does fpc support unit names with more than one dot or is planned?
>
> begin
> test.sec.doit;
> end.
Don't you think this is very confusing ?
Micha
___
fpc-pascal
mariano podesta wrote:
> hi,
> does fpc support unit names with more than one dot or is planned?
>
> in delphi 7 you can compile this:
This looks to me like a delphi bug. A unit must be a valid pascal
identifier. Or is there any use in supporting this?
>
> // unit main.dpr
> program main;
>
>
Am Montag, den 27.06.2005, 19:33 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > not long ago there has been some talk about a test framework for object
> > pascal on this list. IIRC it was some sort of port of junit to pascal.
> >
> > Is it in
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>Where can I find it?
>>
>>
>
>It's included with FPC by default. Sources are in fcl/fpcunit.
>Just include fpcunit in your source. See the examples for a console demo.
>
>Lazarus has a special package that allows you to create either a GUI or
>a console test applic
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not long ago there has been some talk about a test framework for object
> pascal on this list. IIRC it was some sort of port of junit to pascal.
>
> Is it in a usable state?
Very much so.
> Where can I find it?
It's included with FPC by de
Hi,
> You may want to have a look at the 4th or 5th GTK article on the website.
> There I explain how you could set up such a thing. (It's the one with the
> breakout game)
I've already read this article, and I tried to write a Widget, that does
this, but it does not work right (I'm searching sti
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Holger Peters wrote:
> Hi,
> are there any alternatives?
> I think of a simple Graphic Unit, or a Widget for GTK with some simple
> drawing functions. I'm satisfied with a simple PutPixel procedure.
You may want to have a look at the 4th or 5th GTK article on the website.
Th
Hello, Holger Peters!
I hvae a unit that sits on top of X and allows run-time switching between
normal and DGA mode, and - in DGA mode - fast painting. There are almost no
widgets, but some examples (two fonts, balls, rainbows, ..). Currently, it
does NOT run under proprietary OS's. Also, it is
Hi,
are there any alternatives?
I think of a simple Graphic Unit, or a Widget for GTK with some simple
drawing functions. I'm satisfied with a simple PutPixel procedure.
Holger
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/m
> I've got a question again :)
>
> I get the mistake, which is described in the FAQ under my Knoppix
> Distribution:
>
> >Why can't the linker find "vga"?
>
> >This error typically looks like this:
>
> >Free Pascal Compiler version 1.0.x [/yy/zz] for i386
> >Copyright (c) 1993-2000 by Flor
92 matches
Mail list logo
