Tony Pelton schrieb:
>>
>>the actual SAX support is for HTML parsing only. The XML parser can only
>>create DOM documents, without using the SAX layer.
>
>
> hmmm ...
>
> ok, let me make sure i understand.
>
> the code in "sax.pp" is not for general use as a sax parser but is in
> support of so
On 12/27/05, Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Pelton schrieb:
> > hi all,
> >
> > i'm a pascal noob, but not a new programmer.
> >
> > i've done a fair bit of XML parser work in Java.
> >
> > i was trying to figure out how to do parsing with SAX in pascal last night.
> >
> > i'm
Tony Pelton schrieb:
> hi all,
>
> i'm a pascal noob, but not a new programmer.
>
> i've done a fair bit of XML parser work in Java.
>
> i was trying to figure out how to do parsing with SAX in pascal last night.
>
> i'm very confused.
Okay I can imagine this... ;)
the actual SAX support is f
On 12/27/05, L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would need to see some sample code that is giving you the abstract error,
> though. I
> just finished dealing with an "abstract error" and all I did was forget to
> place the
> override keyword after the function declaration in the *derivative* cla
>second, for hoots and hollers, i subclassed/extended the SAXFilter
>class ... thinking that it looked like the descendent of everything
>else, thinking that it was itself the parser and handler, and tried to
>override some of the callback functions ... but when i call parse on
>it, i get an erro
