On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 10:06 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 05/06/2010, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> > I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed
> > a long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
>
> I have looked into this as well, abou
OK guys, after contemplating all your suggestions, I decide to follow the
SynEdit way, that is, synregexpr unit. I suppose this unit tends to get more
maintenance in the future.
Concerning the C++ PCRE library, it is the most full-featured reg-expr
implementation, but calling C++ functions from
http://delphi.about.com/od/toppicks/tp/delphi-regular-expressions.htm
The regex unit in SynEdit is an old version of the code from
regexpstudio.com (which seems to be offline) is said to be very slow
for processing large sets of data, like a whole file. In SynEdit it`s
used to process single lines
Hi
> Speed is important to me, but reg-expr features is important as well.
> Actually, I want to include reg-expr as an alternative search mode in
> my general-purpose file search unit.
Then the SynEdit's version of regexp should be fast enough.
SynEdit editor in Lazarus for example uses it and i
On June 6, 2010 3:06:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I have looked into this as well, about 2 months ago. From my initial
> research it seems the regex unit included with FCL is not as
> feature-complete as the one in SynEdit.
On June 6, 2010 3:54:53 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
>I also chose SynEdi
I also chose SynEdit for Lazarus Delphi converter for some reason. (I think it
was the first hit when searching "regexp" from Lazarus code base).
It works well.
I would guess the other choices work well, too.
About the speed difference: I don't believe there is any huge difference.
Please remembe
On 05/06/2010, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed
> a long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
I have looked into this as well, about 2 months ago. From my initial
research it seems the regex unit inclu
Schindler Karl-Michael wrote on June 6, 2010 1:09:02 AM:
>The pcre library (written in C) has a good reputation. You can get
pascal headers from the Project JEDI Code Library (JCL).
Wow, that seems a more promising approach in the current time, I'll look on it.
Thanks so much.
BTW, which approa
Hi
The pcre library (written in C) has a good reputation. You can get pascal
headers from the Project JEDI Code Library (JCL).
Mischi___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed a
> long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
> should be used. I need an advice about which unit should be used in terms of
10 matches
Mail list logo
